Tír Na HiFi

what do you mean by clipping ? sounds ok to me.

sbgk wrote:what do you mean by clipping ? sounds ok to me.

3.39 has no clipping. full weight full depth. most manly sound.

clipping is good. too much is not good.

Thankfully I can't play those avx2 versions. Nail clippings and cadburys chocolate what has happened to MQn?
I wonder would they sound steely with Metallica?

6.05 sse is... everything vibrates the same way? sometimes it is extremely impressive... sometimes just feels weird...

the density/vibration is impressive as it is... dense like chocolate here in my setup...

jesuscheung wrote:6.05 sse is... everything vibrates the same way? sometimes it is extremely impressive... sometimes just feels weird...

the density/vibration is impressive as it is... dense like chocolate here in my setup...

Nothing exciting in these last few
bass is weird
Maybe just a bad method to add weight

The sse 2 was as good as any this time

Stick with 5.98 this time
Will check 5.14 again in case I missed something

sbgk wrote:what do you mean by clipping ? sounds ok to me.

Like an old record.
Maybe is "to analog"?! :))))

does 5.14 AVX2 has the treble dynamic like 2.71?
2.71 has gold colour treble tonality. shiny liquid with texture

sima66 wrote:

sbgk wrote:what do you mean by clipping ? sounds ok to me.

Like an old record.
Maybe is "to analog"?! :))))

Or too charming, that drives me to sleep in, after long listening...:)

anyone tried that manifest i made?
try it on the classic 2.71 v2, you won't disappointed. all things better... from details to correctness
it was thin sounding. now is rich...

jesuscheung wrote:anyone tried that manifest i made?

Yes, I just tried it at the end of my tests and in my system it didn't improve the sound. I used 2496 3.39 avx, which is still my absolute favourite (for various reasons 2496 just sounds much better than 1644 in my setup), and your manifest file dampened detail and collapsed sound stage. It might work for others though, just not for me.