Page 481 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:20 pm
by cvrle59
Agree with Aleg...
Never say never, but 5.14 is hard to beat, IMO. It is so good, and natural, and it should be used as a reference to built all other variations of it to satisfy different formats and different containers.
I posted link to google drive, for 5.14 version, whoever missed to download it. It is on page 476, very last post.

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 2:20 pm
by tony
Thanks George downloaded will hopefully give it a listen tomorrow.

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:27 pm
by sima66
Aleg wrote:
sima66 wrote:
tony wrote:Didn't you hear we all use iTunes now mqn was a hoax!
Thanks Tony, like always, I'm the last one to find out! :(

Gordon, is there a possibility to get any of the latest versions in 32 bits (24/96 and 24/88)?
Rather not based on the latest versions.
I would say based on 5.14 which is still by far the best we've had.

Cheers

Aleg
The reason I said "any of the latest versions" (by Gordon's choice) is that I know that Gordon doesn't prefer much 5.14! Since I'm still using vintage 2.71 for HiRez, I will be happy with anything newer I can get!

BTW I agree with 5.14. :))))

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:44 pm
by Aleg
sima66 wrote:
Aleg wrote:
Rather not based on the latest versions.
I would say based on 5.14 which is still by far the best we've had.

Cheers

Aleg
... I know that Gordon doesn't prefer much 5.14! ...

BTW I agree with 5.14. :))))
I know, but I can't understand why, as it is absolutely the most musical one, the only one ever capable of showing the finest musical nuances in a performance.
Most others "grunt" compared to 5.14. Certainly none of the newer versions have ever reached the level of subtleties shown by 5.14, however 'technically more advanced' they may be. In the end the proof of the pudding is in the eating and not the baking!!!

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:30 pm
by tony
I wonder would Gordon consider fleshing out 5.14 to include all hires?
It would be nice to have a benchmark version to capture all the testing and effort.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:58 am
by jrling
Let's not forget us SSE2 laggards with 5.14 which we read so much good about, but have not been able to hear ourselves.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:04 pm
by wushuliu
jrling wrote:Let's not forget us SSE2 laggards with 5.14 which we read so much good about, but have not been able to hear ourselves.
Yes 5.14 SSE2 and regular for AVS some of us lesser folk would be great!

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:59 pm
by nige2000
wushuliu wrote:
jrling wrote:Let's not forget us SSE2 laggards with 5.14 which we read so much good about, but have not been able to hear ourselves.
Yes 5.14 SSE2 and regular for AVS some of us lesser folk would be great!
did you try running mqncontrol as administrator in its properties/compatibility/all users

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:04 pm
by Aleg
nige2000 wrote:
wushuliu wrote:
jrling wrote:Let's not forget us SSE2 laggards with 5.14 which we read so much good about, but have not been able to hear ourselves.
Yes 5.14 SSE2 and regular for AVS some of us lesser folk would be great!
did you try running mqncontrol as administrator in its properties/compatibility/all users

Yep, i3 4330 should be able to do the avx versions according to Intel
Instruction Set Extensions SSE4.1/4.2 AVX2.0
You may have to try a few of the tricks mentioned earlier.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:06 pm
by sbgk
uploaded 5.90 16/44 avx2, think I found something to improve things. Just back from Vienna, what a place.