Page 451 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:51 pm
by Aleg
sbgk wrote:jesuscheung wrote:nop... 5.05 not better. treble lacks warmth
for me, 4.74 is best. all things ok.
combine of hires + musicality
need to more micro-refinement
uploaded 5.06 avx/sse2 = 4.74 with new compiler plus alignment, any better ?
I'm really sorry, but this is really, really awful.
Bland, textureless, no highs, full textureless lows.
This one goes straight to the bin.
Again, sorry
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:30 pm
by sbgk
Aleg wrote:sbgk wrote:jesuscheung wrote:nop... 5.05 not better. treble lacks warmth
for me, 4.74 is best. all things ok.
combine of hires + musicality
need to more micro-refinement
uploaded 5.06 avx/sse2 = 4.74 with new compiler plus alignment, any better ?
I'm really sorry, but this is really, really awful.
Bland, textureless, no highs, full textureless lows.
This one goes straight to the bin.
Again, sorry
and the 128 version ?
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:57 pm
by Aleg
sbgk wrote:Aleg wrote:sbgk wrote:
uploaded 5.06 avx/sse2 = 4.74 with new compiler plus alignment, any better ?
I'm really sorry, but this is really, really awful.
Bland, textureless, no highs, full textureless lows.
This one goes straight to the bin.
Again, sorry
and the 128 version ?
That's much better again.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:27 pm
by sbgk
great,
have uploaded another 3 versions of that one, pick the best and I'll call it a day.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:28 pm
by nige2000
What about 5.00 in a 128 version?
Or is there a fault in 5.00 I missed
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:35 pm
by sbgk
nige2000 wrote:What about 5.00 in a 128 version?
Or is there a fault in 5.00 I missed
you don't like 5.06 128 ?
5.00 uses 128 already
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:41 pm
by nige2000
No its very good
But 5.00 sounds better to me
It's a bit like 5.06 without the extra sugar
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:43 pm
by Aleg
sbgk wrote:great,
have uploaded another 3 versions of that one, pick the best and I'll call it a day.
Merge no al nudges ahead of no merge al and both are better than no merge no al
So: merge no al > no merge al >> no merge no al
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:45 pm
by Aleg
nige2000 wrote:No its very good
But 5.00 sounds better to me
It's a bit like 5.06 without the extra sugar
Try 5.06 merge no al and say again what you think !!
Cheers
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:46 pm
by sbgk
Aleg wrote:sbgk wrote:great,
have uploaded another 3 versions of that one, pick the best and I'll call it a day.
Merge no al nudges ahead of no merge al and both are better than no merge no al
So: merge no al > no merge al >> no merge no al
thanks
5.06 original was merge al, how does that compare with merge no al ?
just been listening to merge no al for the last 30 mins and sounds good.