Re: MQN
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 11:57 am
I take it everyone has listened 2.60 sse4 intel 8 4
Haven't had any bad feedback so shall use that one for 24 bit etc
Haven't had any bad feedback so shall use that one for 24 bit etc
Ok with mesbgk wrote:I take it everyone has listened 2.60 sse4 intel 8 4
Haven't had any bad feedback so shall use that one for 24 bit etc
listened to it again, very good micro detail, just a tad bass shysbgk wrote:I take it everyone has listened 2.60 sse4 intel 8 4
Haven't had any bad feedback so shall use that one for 24 bit etc
couldnt say thatsbgk wrote:listened to it again, very good micro detail, just a tad bass shysbgk wrote:I take it everyone has listened 2.60 sse4 intel 8 4
Haven't had any bad feedback so shall use that one for 24 bit etc
I have some options.nige2000 wrote:couldnt say thatsbgk wrote:listened to it again, very good micro detail, just a tad bass shysbgk wrote:I take it everyone has listened 2.60 sse4 intel 8 4
Haven't had any bad feedback so shall use that one for 24 bit etc
this far in we may begin to realise the differences with pc equipment
there seems to be many many things that affect the sound
what you going to do go for another version/variant
Edit you posted this yourself Sbgk about 2.60 a bit bass shy but if you get 24bit version working on that I can see you doing the same subsequently that has occurred with 2.59. i.e. you will cover all bases with your experiments and fill out any gaps that people perceive.sbgk wrote:I take it everyone has listened 2.60 sse4 intel 8 4
Haven't had any bad feedback so shall use that one for 24 bit etc
prefer not to, that's why I trying to get a settled version.tony wrote:Edit you posted this yourself Sbgk about 2.60 a bit bass shy but if you get 24bit version working on that I can see you doing the same subsequently that has occurred with 2.59. i.e. you will cover all bases with your experiments and fill out any gaps that people perceive.sbgk wrote:I take it everyone has listened 2.60 sse4 intel 8 4
Haven't had any bad feedback so shall use that one for 24 bit etc
has more bass than that 2.59 one.tony wrote:I need to go off and have a listen to the 2.60 versions as I have been enjoying a variety of the 2.59's over the last couple of days albeit with vey minimal listening time. As I seem to post a lot these days it will be early next week before I can have a decent go at it. Probably too late to influence choice but happy to go with the flow.
Just another question is that version similar to the longwinded 2.59 regarded as bass shy? I didn't find that one too shy if that helps.