Page 432 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:12 am
by jesuscheung
4.62 sounds extremely good. resolution is new high for sse version?
bass seems very tight!
wait... tight bass translates to intense vocal. needs softening

all things are good. tempo. decay. depth. analog. real
micro is recent best -> no earaches on headphone at close distance.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 9:23 am
by jesuscheung
don't like 4.63... intense... intense... remains me of monster headphones...
don't like 4.64 either...
4.65 not good either... music is too fast

4.62 is better

those who enjoys details, should try 4.62. i think its resolution > 3.39. also more correct vibration/texture

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 12:36 pm
by sbgk
4.67 should sound the most natural

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 1:04 pm
by nige2000
What was 4.63
Interesting version

Great resolution
Maybe too much for me too in the really fast and complex but the rest of the time the resolution helps the flow
Only had a quick browse up to 3.65 need more listening to be sure
There's a flow and an atmosphere in 3.14/3.39 that hasn't been bettered yet

Is a 448 version impossible?

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:04 pm
by jesuscheung
nige2000 wrote: There's a flow and an atmosphere in 3.14/3.39 that hasn't been bettered yet
think should just let atmosphere, soundstage etc to naturally happen.

there is almost no explicit information regarding soundstage in a PCM wav file.
only weak signals in sound

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:19 pm
by nige2000
Which version has best flow for you jc
4.68 seems very good but makes me feel a bit edgy
Lowering the clockrate helps a small bit

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:22 pm
by Aleg
jesuscheung wrote:
nige2000 wrote: There's a flow and an atmosphere in 3.14/3.39 that hasn't been bettered yet
....there is almost no explicit information regarding soundstage in a PCM wav file.
only weak signals in sound
What a strange remark????????????????

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:32 pm
by nige2000
Aleg wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:
nige2000 wrote: There's a flow and an atmosphere in 3.14/3.39 that hasn't been bettered yet
....there is almost no explicit information regarding soundstage in a PCM wav file.
only weak signals in sound
What a strange remark????????????????
Wasn't just me then?

Think flow reverb is the issue now?
What's it sound like there?

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:48 pm
by jesuscheung
nige2000 wrote:Which version has best flow for you jc
4.68 seems very good but makes me feel a bit edgy
Lowering the clockrate helps a small bit
probably 100000.

sbgk, makes sse version as well as avx.
cannot always test avx.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:53 pm
by jesuscheung
Aleg wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:
nige2000 wrote: There's a flow and an atmosphere in 3.14/3.39 that hasn't been bettered yet
....there is almost no explicit information regarding soundstage in a PCM wav file.
only weak signals in sound
What a strange remark????????????????
there no exact coordinates x y z as to where every instrument is located.

soundstage is based on correct music/vibration. when music is correct, soundstage is automatically correct.

didn't you realize, when drum weight changes, flow also changes? this is just one example.