MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Tip: Styles can be applied quickly to selected text.

Post by Aleg »

3daudio wrote:Hi all,

none of the 3.7x versions is doing it for me. Musicality and flow is lost in detail porn. I do like details or porn for that matter, but it somehow seems to fall apart and gets exhausting to listen to.

3.41 with 1.4 control is better in that regard. Still plenty of details, but more flow of the music.

Back to your regular program.
3D

I find that a strange opinion you expressed here.
You donot want to hear all the details that are present in the recording, but want them masked in favour of ????
Imho these 3.75/3.27/3.14 and some earlier ones are the only ones showing the true recording, the others are some form DSP-/EQ-ing which is best done outside a software player somewhere else in the playback chain.

You could try something like this, which has a very appropriate name: http://delamanchavst.wordpress.com/2013 ... /unstable/
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

i actually lost track of which control i use hehe

downloaded 1.4 control. does flow a lot better with 3.41 than whatever control i had...

tried 1.4 control with 3.56see. not good at all

how can we test so many combo...
Karl
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:44 am

Re: MQN

Post by Karl »

Look at 3D setup:

WinServer12/AudioOptimizer -> AR-T Legato II -> AMR DP-777

Very, very exakt clock in the DDC and in the S/PDIF Receiver.

Very, very exakt by hardware and software could be too much for musical enjoyment.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

he was right though, 3.81 onwards are a bit easier to listen to
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

sbgk wrote:he was right though, 3.81 onwards are a bit easier to listen to
3.82 has lost control of the sound, it is floating around and very diffuse.
3.81 not so (much).
3.82 is unlistenable with acoustic instruments.
Will try 3.81 for a longer period somewhat later tonight and check on other aspects.

Cheers
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
sima66
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:35 pm
Location: Canada

Re: MQN

Post by sima66 »

Karl wrote:Look at 3D setup:

WinServer12/AudioOptimizer -> AR-T Legato II -> AMR DP-777

Very, very exakt clock in the DDC and in the S/PDIF Receiver.

Very, very exakt by hardware and software could be too much for musical enjoyment.

Than, Karl, you are a very lucky guy! For a 1K system (or less) you will get the best musical enjoyment! :))))))))
I5 4440+TXCOmobo+JCAT Femto-Intona-JKRegen+HynesPS+TeraDak ATX-820W=JCATusb=DiverterHR=Wadia 931/922(GNSC mod)=PassLabsXA100.5=2xValhalla=Stacked&moded ESL57+JAS SuperTweet+2MJ Acoustics Ref.I
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
User avatar
satshanti
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:59 pm

Re: MQN

Post by satshanti »

I'm lagging behind... too many versions, one after the other :-)

I did some listening of avx 3.73 - 3.79 in comparison with one of my references 3.72 with the result in ascending order:

3.79 wrong timing, switch off after 20 seconds
3.77 tonally balanced but somewhat muddled and timing slightly off
3.74 much too warm and dark
3.72 old reference
3.73 more detail, but bit too dark
3.78 good timing, but bit too light
3.76 pretty good, mids too prominent, attack & sound stage bit blurred
3.75 good overall balance, but some realism lost compared to 3.76

When I convert the tracks to 24/96 and play them with avx 2.99, or even better 3.39 (discovered today that take 2 of that version does work on my system), I get a significantly more realistic and overall better sound that sort of adopts the best of 3.75 and 3.76, and then some.

Missed the new versions from 2.80 onwards so will test those tomorrow, or whenever I have time again, whichever comes first. :-)
uwtfplay on AMD FX8120@1600 RAM@800 FSB@1200 | AQ Jitterbug | Atlas Element USB cable | HiFimeDIY Sabre DAC 2 | NVA Super Sound Pipe | SMSL sApII headphone amp | AKG K702 (or HiFimeDIY UD20 DDX amp | Anti-Cable | Celestion DL6-II)
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

Karl wrote:Look at 3D setup:

WinServer12/AudioOptimizer -> AR-T Legato II -> AMR DP-777

Very, very exakt clock in the DDC and in the S/PDIF Receiver.

Very, very exakt by hardware and software could be too much for musical enjoyment.
Whats your pc setup?
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

satshanti wrote:I'm lagging behind... too many versions, one after the other :-)

I did some listening of avx 3.73 - 3.79 in comparison with one of my references 3.72 with the result in ascending order:

3.79 wrong timing, switch off after 20 seconds
3.77 tonally balanced but somewhat muddled and timing slightly off
3.74 much too warm and dark
3.72 old reference
3.73 more detail, but bit too dark
3.78 good timing, but bit too light
3.76 pretty good, mids too prominent, attack & sound stage bit blurred
3.75 good overall balance, but some realism lost compared to 3.76

When I convert the tracks to 24/96 and play them with avx 2.99, or even better 3.39 (discovered today that take 2 of that version does work on my system), I get a significantly more realistic and overall better sound that sort of adopts the best of 3.75 and 3.76, and then some.

Missed the new versions from 2.80 onwards so will test those tomorrow, or whenever I have time again, whichever comes first. :-)
whats the fate of the DDDac then ?
you still stuck with headphones?
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
lukivision
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 10:10 pm

Re: MQN

Post by lukivision »

Im very happy with 3.82. Cristal-clear resolution, really no audible distortion, precise channel separation. Seems to subtract nothing from the file/signal. Very easy listening all night long. Best Version for me so far. Thanks a lot!
Post Reply