jesuscheung wrote:2channelaudio wrote:
My experience is more often than not MQN favours a slightly forward & bright presentation.
....
Personally I like 3.34sse2, its noticeably richer than 3.56sse2..
I also like 2.59... not sure which version I have..
To me it seems that some of the main contributors to feedback on this thread prefer a slightly forward and thinner sound... ...
jesuscheung wrote:
yes. 3.34sse2 has better bass than 3.56sse2. better bass=richer sound.
my favorite bass version is actually the ancient mqn.exe2.2
do you find 3.56 bright? if so, something else is causing it.
.................................
No I don't find 3.56 bright, necessarily.......
I do however believe there are more musical versions available.
I also believe many listeners on this forum prefer leaner and more clinical rendering to me which is fine.
I would hazard to guess these listeners favour mostly Classical music.
Today I listened to MQN 3.56 for a few hours. After some time MQN became fatiguing.
I didn't experience this when I switched across to playpcmwin.
Both were outputting via my Yellowtec PUC2 lite (USB to AES/spdif) to my NOS TDA1541a DAC.
JC, I would also not consider my system bright.
It is however quite neutral and resolving.
My speakers use the seas H1262-08 MCA15RCY midrange driver which has an pretty flat 'in room' response.
My SB acoustic tweeter is also detailed and quite sweet... It has a nice 'flattish' off axis response to 15k (+3/-3db in room @ listening position) quickly thereafter it rolls off due to my listening position.
Look MQN has so many versions its just about system matching..... I also believe 'user' mood plays a BIG role in how something sounds... at a 'captured' point in time.
Like I said before, there will never be one perfect version of MQN.
2CA