Page 302 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:46 pm
by tony
Lads would it not be better to start a new thread on that dac as it might create some traffic on it? Ask Fran to move the posts to a new thread.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:18 am
by sbgk
R2.78 sse2 reduced size to 8kb from 81kb, not 10 times more resolution, but there is some improvement.

This version somewhere between 2.73 and 2.75.

correct that, there's a lot more resolution.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:28 am
by cvrle59
sbgk wrote:R2.78 sse2 reduced size to 8kb from 81kb, not 10 times more resolution, but there is some improvement.

This version somewhere between 2.73 and 2.75.

correct that, there's a lot more resolution.
What control do you suggest with it?

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:36 am
by sbgk
cvrle59 wrote:
sbgk wrote:R2.78 sse2 reduced size to 8kb from 81kb, not 10 times more resolution, but there is some improvement.

This version somewhere between 2.73 and 2.75.

correct that, there's a lot more resolution.
What control do you suggest with it?
think I'm using 1.5, pretty sure it's the same as avx 10000, just the 24/192 is fixed.

this is one of the biggest lifts in SQ I've heard.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:49 am
by cvrle59
sbgk wrote:
cvrle59 wrote:
sbgk wrote:R2.78 sse2 reduced size to 8kb from 81kb, not 10 times more resolution, but there is some improvement.

This version somewhere between 2.73 and 2.75.

correct that, there's a lot more resolution.
What control do you suggest with it?
think I'm using 1.5, pretty sure it's the same as avx 10000, just the 24/192 is fixed.

this is one of the biggest lifts in SQ I've heard.
I have quite a few changes in my system recently, and it's not so easy to compare, but 2.78 sounds really good.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:58 am
by sbgk
cvrle59 wrote: I have quite a few changes in my system recently, and it's not so easy to compare, but 2.78 sounds really good.
wouldn't expect any previous version to touch 2.78, it's on another level.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:03 am
by tony
cvrle59 wrote:
This version somewhere between 2.73 and 2.75.

I have quite a few changes in my system recently, and it's not so easy to compare, but 2.78 sounds really good.
Have to go to bed but I can echo those comments and while not easy to compare this version has great control. I thought it was a wrap awhile back but maybe this is the chosen one. Has the detail tone and control on the usual MQn signature test track by OP it sounds great. Goodnight

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:42 am
by nige2000
8kb really
8
Wow

Is this avx "able"

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:51 am
by sbgk
nige2000 wrote:8kb really
8
Wow

Is this avx "able"
uploaded avx version.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:14 am
by cvrle59
sbgk wrote:
nige2000 wrote:8kb really
8
Wow

Is this avx "able"
uploaded avx version.
I can't run any of these new avx versions. I am wondering if I'm supposed with i7-2760QM? If so, what is the right control for?