Re: Best way to Rip?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:35 pm
When the cMP project started cics made provision for ripping to be done within cMP.
Until we deleted this ability away that is how I made all of my rips.
I can see now that one of the things that made the cMP setup sound as good as it did for its time was that the ripping was part of the system.
After this was lost and I had to use another machine for ripping I must admit I did not hear a difference but I was not looking for it, either. Which is one of the foibles of these projects.
At this point I am getting close to the minimal OS for ripping with dBpoweramp. My WINDOWS folder is less than 60 mB. I know there are some .exe files to be deleted and a few .sys files in drivers but it is down to trying one at a time. There is lots of work left in the registry though the registry is a shadow of its former self.
This is a single purpose OS. When you turn the machine on you are at dBpoweramp. EXPLORER has been deleted in the c: folder and most of the registry. I am sure there are some more references in there, still. I am using two SSDs with one motherboard so when you want to transfer the files to the SD card you must turn off the machine and reboot into another OS. I am using the basic starting point of the rip OS to do this work. AS minimized as it was with nLite it still does this (and many other things) just fine.
The dBpoweramp folder is full of stuff that I will never use so I will start getting rid of that.
At this point there is something very interesting going on. I can only assume there is a large amount of noise missing from the rips. There is an ease to the presentation versus my old rips done on a regular WINDOWS 8.1 machine and my home UBUNTU machine. These new rips sound very different; not in tonal balance so much, increased dynamics are apparent but the main thing is what is not there. There is a clarity that allows details to be heard but not in a plastic capacitor kind of way. The old window analogy is the best I can come up with. The glass is much cleaner.
Randy, give me an idea of what music you listen to and I will send you a card with some files. I figure that is an easy way to get another opinion.
There is so much more information on these disks than I realized.
Why this aspect of digital audio has been glossed over by all of us is a mystery. We go to Herculean efforts on the playback side and have believed that anything goes with ripping once uses a good program.
All I can say is these rips on the SDTrans are beyond anything I could have imagined.
I am hoping the thing is portable. This one was made with HASWELL and H81 MB. I think one can copy it to a drive and it should boot. I do worry if it can recognize a different CD-ROM. I am using the $20.00 ASUS drive that is ubiquitous. I am using a SATADOM for the OS and another SDD for the "other" OS. The files are loaded onto this SDD during ripping. I will probably use a dedicated SDD (or laptop HDD, can''t decide which would be best) eventually.
As I mentioned, when WINDOWS gets small you no longer need an image program to make a usable copy. When I get done I will see if I can copy it. If it works I can send it to those who would like to try it. Otherwise I will have to write instructions which could take as long as doing it! Even if it doesn't work one can use this copy and mimic it with your own system. If you are familiar with the guts of WINDOWS this is no big deal. Otherwise it can be an interesting learning experience.
Until we deleted this ability away that is how I made all of my rips.
I can see now that one of the things that made the cMP setup sound as good as it did for its time was that the ripping was part of the system.
After this was lost and I had to use another machine for ripping I must admit I did not hear a difference but I was not looking for it, either. Which is one of the foibles of these projects.
At this point I am getting close to the minimal OS for ripping with dBpoweramp. My WINDOWS folder is less than 60 mB. I know there are some .exe files to be deleted and a few .sys files in drivers but it is down to trying one at a time. There is lots of work left in the registry though the registry is a shadow of its former self.
This is a single purpose OS. When you turn the machine on you are at dBpoweramp. EXPLORER has been deleted in the c: folder and most of the registry. I am sure there are some more references in there, still. I am using two SSDs with one motherboard so when you want to transfer the files to the SD card you must turn off the machine and reboot into another OS. I am using the basic starting point of the rip OS to do this work. AS minimized as it was with nLite it still does this (and many other things) just fine.
The dBpoweramp folder is full of stuff that I will never use so I will start getting rid of that.
At this point there is something very interesting going on. I can only assume there is a large amount of noise missing from the rips. There is an ease to the presentation versus my old rips done on a regular WINDOWS 8.1 machine and my home UBUNTU machine. These new rips sound very different; not in tonal balance so much, increased dynamics are apparent but the main thing is what is not there. There is a clarity that allows details to be heard but not in a plastic capacitor kind of way. The old window analogy is the best I can come up with. The glass is much cleaner.
Randy, give me an idea of what music you listen to and I will send you a card with some files. I figure that is an easy way to get another opinion.
There is so much more information on these disks than I realized.
Why this aspect of digital audio has been glossed over by all of us is a mystery. We go to Herculean efforts on the playback side and have believed that anything goes with ripping once uses a good program.
All I can say is these rips on the SDTrans are beyond anything I could have imagined.
I am hoping the thing is portable. This one was made with HASWELL and H81 MB. I think one can copy it to a drive and it should boot. I do worry if it can recognize a different CD-ROM. I am using the $20.00 ASUS drive that is ubiquitous. I am using a SATADOM for the OS and another SDD for the "other" OS. The files are loaded onto this SDD during ripping. I will probably use a dedicated SDD (or laptop HDD, can''t decide which would be best) eventually.
As I mentioned, when WINDOWS gets small you no longer need an image program to make a usable copy. When I get done I will see if I can copy it. If it works I can send it to those who would like to try it. Otherwise I will have to write instructions which could take as long as doing it! Even if it doesn't work one can use this copy and mimic it with your own system. If you are familiar with the guts of WINDOWS this is no big deal. Otherwise it can be an interesting learning experience.