Page 292 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:32 pm
by Sligolad
Tried 2.55 with Latest Control R1.4 and thought it was good, then tried old mqncontrol.exe 24 bit avx2 V1 1000000 and now love what I am hearing at a short listen.
Up for serious consideration at the moment to take over the MQN Best Folder for me.
Sounds amazing as I am typing right now.
Great work.
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:47 pm
by sbgk
just changed over from control 1.4 to avx 100000 and it does sound more realistic, still a mystery what's going on there.
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:16 pm
by minionas
Miracle! With 2.55 im hearing music out of my rDac. 1.4 and 100000 controls also work! Before none of 10ms worked for me! Huge thanks sbgk!!!
Now off for some listen!:)
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:45 pm
by minionas
Well.. With 100000 it's pretty damn impressive after all '512' versions and v7 avx also. Wanna listen some more!:)
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:48 pm
by sbgk
nearly there - uploaded 2.56, which differs from 2.55 by 1 instruction, sounds different, is it better ? difference is for 16/44 only.
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:03 pm
by tony
sbgk wrote:nearly there - uploaded 2.56, which differs from 2.55 by 1 instruction, sounds different, is it better ? difference is for 16/44 only.
Heard that before maybe when 2.56 without any avx etc was around sometime last year!
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:14 pm
by sbgk
tony wrote:sbgk wrote:nearly there - uploaded 2.56, which differs from 2.55 by 1 instruction, sounds different, is it better ? difference is for 16/44 only.
Heard that before maybe when 2.56 without any avx etc was around sometime last year!
the energy you used to write that ditty could have been used to try 2.56 !
don't think it's got any merit, but sounds different anyway.
another example of how the instructions affect the sq as the data passes through the cpu. Wonder how the cpu bypass project is progressing.
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:46 pm
by nige2000
tony wrote:sbgk wrote:nearly there - uploaded 2.56, which differs from 2.55 by 1 instruction, sounds different, is it better ? difference is for 16/44 only.
Heard that before maybe when 2.56 without any avx etc was around sometime last year!
nope thats only 6 mths or so ago
addicts are always quitting
go listen to avx 2.55 and come back to us (hires i think too)
the control file thing is weird needs to be the old one
is there a mistake in the newer controls?
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:24 pm
by tony
sbgk wrote:tony wrote:sbgk wrote:nearly there - uploaded 2.56, which differs from 2.55 by 1 instruction, sounds different, is it better ? difference is for 16/44 only.
Heard that before maybe when 2.56 without any avx etc was around sometime last year!
the energy you used to write that ditty could have been used to try 2.56 !
Not tonight I am afraid but will definitely do my homework tomorrow.
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:50 pm
by sbgk
tony wrote:
Not tonight I am afraid but will definitely do my homework tomorrow.
it's not work if it's your hobby
listening to Claire Martin's Too much in love to care on 24/96, heard her live last year and with 2.55 this is the first time it has sounded like a live set, the sounds of the vocal, piano, bass and drums are much more distinct and you can hear how the songs are constructed. Not sure if kernel streaming would add anything more, but it's sounding very good with just wasapi.