Page 277 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:16 pm
by sima66
Sligolad wrote:Aleg wrote:sbgk wrote:Just discovered something that lifts MQn into Jplay levels of detail retrieval, uploaded 2.31 sse2.
2.30 and 2.31 can play all resolutions.
A 32-bit avx 2.31 version perhaps?
Sse2-2.31 is also sounding very good.
Not done comparisons yet
Cheers
Aleg
+1 for 32 bit version :-))
+2
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:30 pm
by Clive
I've been comparing SSE2 R2.31 to some of my best vinyl (Trans-Fi Salvation deck & London Reference cartridge). I really struggled to hear meaningful differences between the two sources. To keep the vinyl sound up with the hirez digital I had to swap to my battery powered phono stage, away from the more euphonic valve phono stage. For anyone not seriously into vinyl I expect you'll not appreciate comparison but the Salvation/Reference combination is amazingly good......so is MQn 2.31.
It's the soundstaging and atmosphere that I feel MQn is doing so well now. Partly this is why I say MQn matches really good vinyl now, it manages to rival the best of vinyl and have all the other benefits of "digital".
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:25 pm
by sbgk
Clive wrote:I've been comparing SSE2 R2.31 to some of my best vinyl (Trans-Fi Salvation deck & London Reference cartridge). I really struggled to hear meaningful differences between the two sources. To keep the vinyl sound up with the hirez digital I had to swap to my battery powered phono stage, away from the more euphonic valve phono stage. For anyone not seriously into vinyl I expect you'll not appreciate comparison but the Salvation/Reference combination is amazingly good......so is MQn 2.31.
It's the soundstaging and atmosphere that I feel MQn is doing so well now. Partly this is why I say MQn matches really good vinyl now, it manages to rival the best of vinyl and have all the other benefits of "digital".
Thanks Clive,
not a pretty platter, must sound good.
What os & cpu do you have ?
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:28 pm
by sbgk
uploaded R2.32, experimental tweak on 16/44 only, sounds good on first impression.
I'm only doing the minimum release because have a number of changes I'm thinking about and it's getting more complicated to update the different versions.
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:49 pm
by darkpink
How do you guys get tasker.exe to work, it just shuts down immediately for me. And is audiophils optimizer worth the money when you use mqn? Thanks
Thank you sbgk for your great work!
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:07 pm
by Clive
sbgk wrote:Clive wrote:I've been comparing SSE2 R2.31 to some of my best vinyl (Trans-Fi Salvation deck & London Reference cartridge). I really struggled to hear meaningful differences between the two sources. To keep the vinyl sound up with the hirez digital I had to swap to my battery powered phono stage, away from the more euphonic valve phono stage. For anyone not seriously into vinyl I expect you'll not appreciate comparison but the Salvation/Reference combination is amazingly good......so is MQn 2.31.
It's the soundstaging and atmosphere that I feel MQn is doing so well now. Partly this is why I say MQn matches really good vinyl now, it manages to rival the best of vinyl and have all the other benefits of "digital".
Thanks Clive,
not a pretty platter, must sound good.
What os & cpu do you have ?
The platter looks good in the flesh...sort of form follows function.
My O/S and cpu are nothing special and the O/S is relatively untweaked - due mostly to lack of time. Unless I have specialist hardware I'd rather keep the tweaking to a minimum especially after finding some optimizers disagreed with my laptop. To answer your question: Windows 8.1 and i5 Ivy Bridge.
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:29 pm
by sbgk
sbgk wrote:uploaded R2.32, experimental tweak on 16/44 only, sounds good on first impression.
I'm only doing the minimum release because have a number of changes I'm thinking about and it's getting more complicated to update the different versions.
R2.32 sounded a bit weird
R2.33 has one setting different, yet sounds totally different. Am having to revisit all my earlier findings as the aim then was to reduce sibilance.
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:34 pm
by sbgk
Clive wrote:sbgk wrote:Clive wrote:I've been comparing SSE2 R2.31 to some of my best vinyl (Trans-Fi Salvation deck & London Reference cartridge). I really struggled to hear meaningful differences between the two sources. To keep the vinyl sound up with the hirez digital I had to swap to my battery powered phono stage, away from the more euphonic valve phono stage. For anyone not seriously into vinyl I expect you'll not appreciate comparison but the Salvation/Reference combination is amazingly good......so is MQn 2.31.
It's the soundstaging and atmosphere that I feel MQn is doing so well now. Partly this is why I say MQn matches really good vinyl now, it manages to rival the best of vinyl and have all the other benefits of "digital".
Thanks Clive,
not a pretty platter, must sound good.
What os & cpu do you have ?
The platter looks good in the flesh...sort of form follows function.
My O/S and cpu are nothing special and the O/S is relatively untweaked - due mostly to lack of time. Unless I have specialist hardware I'd rather keep the tweaking to a minimum especially after finding some optimizers disagreed with my laptop. To answer your question: Windows 8.1 and i5 Ivy Bridge.
that looks better than the picture on the website, what drives the linear arm so the needle follows the track ?
I'm also using win8.1, but haswell i5 laptop. win 2012 is a worthwhile upgrade if you have access to it.
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:44 pm
by sbgk
sbgk wrote:sbgk wrote:uploaded R2.32, experimental tweak on 16/44 only, sounds good on first impression.
I'm only doing the minimum release because have a number of changes I'm thinking about and it's getting more complicated to update the different versions.
R2.32 sounded a bit weird
R2.33 has one setting different, yet sounds totally different. Am having to revisit all my earlier findings as the aim then was to reduce sibilance.
think 2.33 is the best so far, top end and speed/dynamics much improved.
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:45 pm
by Clive
what drives the linear arm so the needle follows the track ?
It's an air bearing. The groove guides the stylus.
BTW MQn sibilance performance is excellent....it's one of my bugbears and I have no issue with it with your software.