Page 268 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:02 pm
by sbgk
Aleg wrote:
Could you also make container size a configurable parameter?
thought about it and think it's best to keep them separate.

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:56 pm
by sima66
sbgk wrote:R2.16 might be worth a listen to
I don't know if is my "Main page" handicapped also, or is just myself, but i don't see the R2.16!
Only R2.15!

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:31 pm
by Aleg
sima66 wrote:
sbgk wrote:R2.16 might be worth a listen to
I don't know if is my "Main page" handicapped also, or is just myself, but i don't see the R2.16!
Only R2.15!
Gordon already moved it to Archive (I don't know why), but can be found here:

It is worth a listen.

Cheers

Aleg

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:48 pm
by nige2000
Didn't think 2.16 was better than 100000 or 2.3
Can we have 2.3 detail back?

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:01 pm
by sima66
Aleg wrote:
sima66 wrote:
sbgk wrote:R2.16 might be worth a listen to
I don't know if is my "Main page" handicapped also, or is just myself, but i don't see the R2.16!
Only R2.15!
Gordon already moved it to Archive (I don't know why), but can be found here:

It is worth a listen.

Cheers

Aleg
Thanks Aleg,

I started to look into Archive, but soon I started to get dizzy and gave up! ;-)

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:24 pm
by jesuscheung
don't see R.2.16...

R2.15 > R2.3

R2.3 has strain. false air. ears can get tired.

R2.15. richer sound. air kept. flow seems different. vocal decay/depth seems lacking a little bit. memory reminds me 100000 was perfect at vocal decay. unable to a b compare. 100000 is on strike.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 11:14 pm
by sbgk
uploaded sse4 R2.17, one of the most detailed versions I've heard.

plus 2.18 which is 2.17 dialled back a bit

and 2.19 just a bit more, that's more like it.

and with R2.20 hopefully we see the beginning of the end. Just try 2.20, no need for the others.

R2.22 just about perfect, to my lugholes anyway. Alfred Brendel on the old joanna never sounded so good.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:29 am
by Clive
I've just tried R2.22 (and R2.15). they won't play. The files load then MQN terminates. This is the first time I've tried any R2. I had been on R1.4. All W8.1

I'm using R1.1 512 mmcss control; am I using the the wrong mqncontrol.exe?

Edit: A pal sent his mqncontol.....it works. I must have got them mixed up.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:09 pm
by Ken Moreland
R2.22 is very good , just listening to it now, very impressed.
KM

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:05 pm
by taggart
R2.22 gives only crackling sound here.