Tír Na HiFi

v3.19.1 256 pop have very good sound depth, mellow and sad music. prefer this style, JC.

now try next versions:
v3.21 256
v3.21.1 256

v3.21.1 256 have interesting sound, maybe here's something not correct?

lekt wrote:v3.19.1 256 pop have very good sound depth, mellow and sad music. prefer this style, JC.

now try next versions:
v3.21 256
v3.21.1 256

v3.21.1 256 have interesting sound, maybe here's something not correct?

3.21.1 has more treble.
3.21 has more bass.

3.19.1 treble > 3.21.1. just more real more engaging.

all 3 versions has different treble/bass ratio. which is better... !!!

3.21 speed/rythm seems a bit slower than norm?

many older versions have great bass. which style is best? (personal favorite bass is 3.9.2 sxb)

3.19.1 has best treble. its bass is great too. just bass quantity is lesser. and focus slightly tites towards treble. love this version too

think v3.19.1 pop have highest average value, all things can be accepted. this version more analog than other, like it.
will improve its bass, tried remove some registers ie. rdi, rbp, they are not good for sound, make bass harder. they can be replaced with stack memory.

uploaded v3.22 256

improved code from v3.19.1 256 pop, don't touch playing thread, removed some things from main thread. as i said, these rdi, rbp didn't use, and sound has become more soft, mellow. like this vibration. think need go by this way, use stack memory instead of registers when outside of loop.

lekt wrote:uploaded v3.22 256
....and sound has become more soft, mellow. like this vibration....

yes! exactly what 3.19x needs!

bass better. seems treble kept. need more testing

----
actually treble lesser a little

v3.22 256 have nice vibration, energy.
but don't know why sound a bit imbalance, need avoid register dependencies after changing code.

3.22 has great bass. the bass is a combine of many goodies from old versions. love this version

[quote="jesuscheung"]3.22 has great bass. the bass is a combine of many goodies from old versions. love this version[/quote]
hmm... can not remove its imbalance, sound have interesting power, emotion.

have detected in commandline string from api function GetCommandLineA. when we write in .bat file:
lekt.exe --file "track1.wav" then OS give internally string:
lekt.exe+space+space+--file "track1.wav" , different in 2 white space characters after lekt.exe.

and any string in code need make align 16 then SQ better, CreateFileA function also read this string to open file. so then need write in .bat file:

lekt.exe file "track1.wav" , GetCommandLineA will give:
lekt.exe+space+space+file "track1.wav" , filepath/name (track1.wav) will start with 16 coz
lekt.exe+space+space+file " contains 16 characters.

try rewrite .bat file, lets 15 characters before filepath, you can test with:
lekt.exe "track1.wav" (6 white spaces) or:
@.exe "track1.wav" (9 white spaces) or:
@.exe 1234567 "track1.wav"

compare SQ. i use white spaces, sound better.

Yes, 3.22 best yet and very nice 16 tweak, thank you!