Page 223 of 299

Re: lekt player

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:17 pm
by lekt
3 last versions v3.12.x, v3.13 not good as i think, sound a bit compressed.

uploaded:
lekt.exe v3.14 256 rbx
lekt.exe v3.14 256 qword
lekt.exe v3.14 256 qword2

interesting tricks with opcode, was modify code on runtime, so then all wasapi's function pointers (and other things) in playing loop use constant values instead of variables. maybe sound better, try them.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 8:25 am
by jesuscheung
quickly tried 3.14 256 rbx. loving it. not the usual lekt sound. need listen listen

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 10:18 pm
by goon-heaven
I like qword2 - seems to be more organic and involving, have more energy and slightly more detail - new favorite.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 3:45 am
by lekt
have tried new method for v3.14.x, think they can be more improved. prefer this method, create code on runtime and manage it, much benefit.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:12 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:have tried new method for v3.14.x, think they can be more improved. prefer this method, create code on runtime and manage it, much benefit.
3.14 is a step forward. seems all things improve. only tempo/pace accuracy is lesser here
prefer rbx here. has added it to my fovorites

----
prefer qword2 now it sounds much better today!

Re: lekt player

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 6:02 am
by lekt
yes, v3.14 256 qword2 have more good things here, like its energy. need improve this code, still have little defect.

from v3.10 256 lekt player doesn't use C-library functions of msvcr120.dll, so then no need install Visual C++ Redistributable Packages for Visual Studio 2013. But i feel using C-library makes sound more warm, only not clean as using functions from kernel32.dll. not sure.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:30 am
by goon-heaven
Thanks for the great news on not having to install C-lib - 1 less clutter in winRAM.

Clean fuctions only please - but best function may be no function that you havent written yourself, hee-hee.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:48 pm
by lekt
goon-heaven wrote:Thanks for the great news on not having to install C-lib - 1 less clutter in winRAM.

Clean fuctions only please - but best function may be no function that you havent written yourself, hee-hee.
still use kernel32.dll, here's calling function latency coz it call ntdll.dll, need use ntdll.dll and more low level.

uploaded:
lekt.exe v3.15 256 heap16
lekt.exe v3.15.1 256 qword3
lekt.exe v3.15.2 256 rbx2

sound more clean, slightly different.
heap16 use new loop, seem more raw, analog. it have potential, code can be optimized later. try them and compare.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 9:27 pm
by goon-heaven
I tried easiest first
and qword3 is my new cleanest favorite. EXCELLENT!

Will compare against heap16 & rbx2 tomorrow..

Re: lekt player

Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:28 am
by jesuscheung
heap16 has more solid sound i never heard before! focus falls back a little.
qword3 is cleaner sound.

prefer rbx2 here. like the bass. not rich like heap16. rbx2 has non-hard sound for all frequencies. better focus

heap16 has potential. more like real sound. rbx2 and qword3 much thinner sounding comparatively