Page 222 of 299
Re: lekt player
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 9:18 pm
by goon-heaven
v3.12 more viseral vibration over v3.11.2 - new favorite - thank you!
will listen to v3.12.1 tomorrow
Re: lekt player
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 2:09 am
by jesuscheung
goon-heaven wrote:v3.12 more viseral vibration over v3.11.2 - new favorite - thank you!
will listen to v3.12.1 tomorrow
3.12 is goooood. maybe the current best piano fast notes
3.12 weight(or decay?) don't feel enough. (piano fast notes which don't need decay, are best i ever heard)
3.12.1 weight maybe a little over
3.12 just feels like... need more bass quantity?!?!
prefer 3.12!
Re: lekt player
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:05 am
by lekt
big sensitive, exchanged registers and sound has become better. there's loop of v3.11.2 is good already, only what regisgters take to use.
3.12.1 use Sleep function instead of WaitForSingleObject for holding child thread. think better but calculation instruction IDIV make sound distorted a bit. division very difficult for computer.
v3.12 is first now.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:20 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:big sensitive, exchanged registers and sound has become better. there's loop of v3.11.2 is good already, only what regisgters take to use.
3.12.1 use Sleep function instead of WaitForSingleObject for holding child thread. think better but calculation instruction IDIV make sound distorted a bit. division very difficult for computer.
v3.12 is first now.
3.12.1 is actually just as good as 3.12
3.12.1 the weight/note accuracy/rhythm is slower than norm.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:47 am
by jesuscheung
lekt, i think @ > !
tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"
@.exe not work for some reason
Re: lekt player
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 5:17 am
by lekt
jesuscheung wrote:lekt, i think @ > !
tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"
@.exe not work for some reason
maybe, will try.
only i think OS function have looking in name's list (or use hash method) so then !, #, $ have character code 33, 35, 36, and ! always first place in order. char code of @ is 64.
@.exe also don't work for me.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:57 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:jesuscheung wrote:lekt, i think @ > !
tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"
@.exe not work for some reason
maybe, will try.
only i think OS function have looking in name's list (or use hash method) so then !, #, $ have character code 33, 35, 36, and ! always first place in order. char code of @ is 64.
@.exe also don't work for me.
Try !.exe --file @.wav" better than
!.exe --file "!.wav"
Re: lekt player
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 7:20 pm
by goon-heaven
/@.exe --file "@.wav" works nicely here.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:33 pm
by lekt
uploaded:
v3.12.2 256
v3.12.3 256
v3.13 256 opcode
opcode have very good focus, seems something makes sound not free. write machine code directly into executing RAM by instructions, there's small block of code can do by this method. try them.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 9:35 am
by jesuscheung
think 3.12.2 is better
need more weight. e.g. vocal weight lesser than 3.9 small