Tír Na HiFi

lekt wrote:i was busy, JC. just only today can back to compile code writen after c2sm.

uploaded:
v2.100.1 160 ca1
v2.100.1 160 ca3
v2.100.1 160 casm

v2.100.2 160 vg1
v2.100.2 160 vg3
v2.100.2 160 vguid

good code after refference assembler of C compiler's report.
prefer vg3. these 6 versions have good emotion. try test ca1, i feel very good emotion, may have effect?

prefer vg1, vg3 and vguid

oganic
vg1>vguid>vg3

technical
vg3>vguid>vg1

emotion
similar

160 seems thinner than 256?
pc bad mood today... need more test...

----
prefer vg1. only because it is organic = less earache

these new versions are good!
seems possible to keep bass in MOD.
seems that reduces stack reserve(=better piano accuracy), sound doesn't get dry/hard!

yes, vg1 is better. bass softness enough.
my laptop today also bad sound, lost many things of sound.

lekt wrote:yes, vg1 is better. bass softness enough.
my laptop today also bad sound, lost many things of sound.

like you said in windows, files need to be contigent/compact. correct delete != correct SQ
my last 2012 iso build is poor. hopefully this time better

uploaded:
v2.100.3 256
v2.100.3 256 c2
v2.100.3 256 c3

v2.100.4 256 bal

i think v2.100.3 c2 is most organic. mellow sound.
v2.100.4 bal more hard a bit but sound have ease, good balance. if you make MOD only improve vibration then maybe it will have most correct sound.

lekt, i am relocation for the coming 12 months or more. cannot test with PC anymore
have to switch to testing with laptop.
sadly my laptop cpu is atom... no sse4, no avx... wtf... need buy new laptop.. no time hehehe

need to find my old pair of sennheiser earphones if i can find them hehehe where are they!!!!!

all new models are rubbish. hifi is nothing like the old days. expensive and crap.

tried a 500usd B&W headphones, wtf was that bass... unbelievable... kids are listening these things they don't know real bass anymore hahaha

am busy setting things up. shall test your new versions later.

c3 seems the best so far

god.. atom cpu is the slowest ever... 2 hours has passed, windows update = 15 of 89.
hopeless

---
c3 seems best. c2 seems second best

ok, don't worry. not always can be in good environment of life. i have only cheap equipments for music but can test by compare method. of course bad for listening.

c3 more vibration, maybe organic enough.
-------------------------

i remember in old days tested on netbook atom 1600mhz /win7 32 bit, sound very clean, clarity. simple mainboard, nothing for tweaking. it doesn't have hi-tech, devices, lesser drivers, very good.
no DVD/CD-ROM: ok, no bus-xx controlers,... and more. seems very simple windows can be installed in this netbook. automatically good tweaked, hehe...

hi JC,
how are you on new life location? maybe cannot with music.

uploaded:
v2.100.5 256 noj
v2.100.5 256 noj c2

i think much better. used new method creating GUIDs for COM objects.
try them.

Been away. Briefly back home before next trip.

both noj sound excellent. Prefer plain noj - more testing needed to explain why.

goon-heaven wrote:Been away. Briefly back home before next trip.

both noj sound excellent. Prefer plain noj - more testing needed to explain why.

yes, noj sound depth better, more organic. only bass a bit hard. i think next version can be fixed.

goon-heaven, i remember sometimes you joined .wav files into one big file. it's good for some albums which needed countinous sound between tracks. but SQ lesser than playing small file. reading file always have bad affecting for player.