Tír Na HiFi

uploaded lekt.exe v2.99.4 256 utl4

back to old compiling method, this result a bit lesser than v2.99.3 xx. i think bass better than v2.99.1.
try it!

lekt wrote:uploaded lekt.exe v2.99.4 256 utl4

back to old compiling method, this result a bit lesser than v2.99.3 xx. i think bass better than v2.99.1.
try it!

most things better. balance better.

----
wonder why mouse screws up the treble in win8?
mouse first inflection point=1.0702667236328125!! WTF IS THIS

xp/vista/win7 = 1.37. simple simple number

Barbra Streisand voice...

here with 2.99.4 when she "releases" her voice it vibrates very well.
but when she "holds" her voice, vibration is difficult. ser1 does this better.


-----
ok... misjudged a little bit...
forgot to delete those dll. now ok. vibrates better!

v2.98.12 256 sop ser focus very good coz free sound, clarity sound. bass rich but why it can vibrate. if its bass a bit more soft...

lekt wrote:v2.98.12 256 sop ser focus very good coz free sound, clarity sound. bass rich but why it can vibrate. if its bass a bit more soft...

sop ser is faster than speed of light. sounds goes up like rocker. and goes down instantly.
i think drum speed of 2.90.7 is lagless.
sop ser drum speed > 2.90.7. cannot hear drum body.

has learn sound of sop ser, its have good elements for refference.

uploaded v2.99.4 256 usbc

compiled combining with USB formated FAT16.
i think this version better, like it bass.

Barbra Streisand is better in each version
2.99.4 usbc > 2.99.4 utl4 > 2.99.1 256 c3


---
all things better! bass speed better.

can play heavy metal, Barbra Streisand, slow + fast music. new best

there's my hard disk is bad, need minimum use it while compiling. take usb for support this task but this usb have led lamp, can not disable it. i think FAT lesser encript/decript than NTFS, take FAT16. what do you think?
maybe will try with FAT32 and NTFS.

all testing versions compiled with usb have good balance, cleaness but mellow seems lesser a bit. think coz led lamp, even too bright.

love bass of v2.99.4 usbc, good presents detailed notes of Phil Collins/Do You Remember, as singing soloist.
and interesting bass of Madonna/The First Album/Holiday. fast notes, hard temp but mellow. player with too soft bass vibration can not play this song, need a bit hard. and Phil Collins's bass also.

lekt wrote:there's my hard disk is bad, need minimum use it while compiling. take usb for support this task but this usb have led lamp, can not disable it. i think FAT lesser encript/decript than NTFS, take FAT16. what do you think?
maybe will try with FAT32 and NTFS.

maybe partition a new fat16 drive with 512MB?

new drive = less SQ
fat16 = more SQ
overall = maybe better.

lekt wrote: all testing versions compiled with usb have good balance, cleaness but mellow seems lesser a bit. think coz led lamp, even too bright.

love bass of v2.99.4 usbc, good presents detailed notes of Phil Collins/Do You Remember, as singing soloist.
and interesting bass of Madonna/The First Album/Holiday. fast notes, hard temp but mellow. player with too soft bass vibration can not play this song, need a bit hard. and Phil Collins's bass also.

v2.99.4 usbc is pretty damn good. all things are great.
no obvious issues.

if possible, make bass faster. don't know what else to improve!

-------
lekt, ntfs vs fat32 vs fat16 = some difference in SQ

i am tuning mouse speed = maybe big difference in SQ. maybe nothing... hehehe

reading how mouse works, it gives me mathetical headache. hehe
mouse rate. 96. screen refresh rate. acceleration curve.... mouse speed vs pointer speed....
anyway, i think first magic number = 1*integer/3.5 rounded to 0.05/0.005/0.0005...
second magic number seems easier enough = 2 or 4 or 8 or 16....
(don't understand why microsoft thinks x.xxx1 is a good number? weird)

shall show you later. need testing this for 1 week.

jesuscheung wrote:maybe partition a new fat16 drive with 512MB?

new drive = less SQ
fat16 = more SQ
overall = maybe better.

good idea. use fat16 can ignore security of ntfs technologue (i think encryption/decryption or some security for seraching in ntfs file table). fat have more simple file/folder list, it's file allocation table.

"new drive = less SQ"
why doesn't reduce drive quantiy? hehe...