Julf wrote:I see that Triode's original squeezelite is open source, and licensed GPLv3. Does that mean the source code of Squeezelite-MQn is available too?
please ban this troll, I won't post until he is.
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:31 am
by Clive
Julf wrote:I see that Triode's original squeezelite is open source, and licensed GPLv3. Does that mean the source code of Squeezelite-MQn is available too?
This is a very deliberate post designed to cause trouble. Given Julf's history elsewhere there can be no doubt he is acting as a troll.
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:35 am
by Julf
My apologies - I thought I was asking a reasonable, on-topic question.
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:41 am
by Clive
Julf wrote:My apologies - I thought I was asking a reasonable, on-topic question.
You're playing the innocent which doesn't cut any ice. The question you've asked is on the same open-source aspect that ended up in your being banned permanently from CA.
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:47 am
by Julf
Clive wrote:
Julf wrote:The question you've asked is on the same open-source aspect that ended up in your being banned permanently from CA.
is the question I asked unreasonable or offending in any way? If so, could you please explain how/why?
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:51 am
by nige2000
Clive wrote:
Julf wrote:My apologies - I thought I was asking a reasonable, on-topic question.
You're playing the innocent which doesn't cut any ice. The question you've asked is on the same open-source aspect that ended up in your being banned permanently from CA.
im sure Julfs more than dubious posting history on other forums will be taken into consideration,
i dont know what motivates this Computer audiophile terrorism with guerrilla warfare tactics on development of making music better
i doubt his ducking and diving will work here
regardless his presense is definitely not here to contribute
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:53 am
by Clive
Julf wrote:
Clive wrote:
Julf wrote:The question you've asked is on the same open-source aspect that ended up in your being banned permanently from CA.
is the question I asked unreasonable or offending in any way? If so, could you please explain how/why?
For anyone who is aware of the history it is blatantly obvious what you are playing at. I will say no more as I am "sending you to Coventry".
nige2000 wrote:i dont know what motivates this Computer audiophile terrorism with guerrilla warfare tactics
Rather harsh words.
I asked a simple question, one that can be answered by a simple "yes, the source code is available <here>", or "no".
It is really very simple. Sbgk is using the work done by Triode, and making a small modification to it. By licensing it using the GPLv3, Triode is stating that he is happy with people using, studying, modifying and changing his code - but with a small proviso that the modifications should be made available to others on the same terms. Not respecting that would constitute a violation of the copyright license terms.