Tír Na HiFi

goon in the old days i tested with ramdrive that fat wins all formats (fat32, ntfs...)

don't think fragment is possible with only 2 files
but adding 1 extra drive = less SQ.
overall gain=?
sounds like a lot of work...

has learning and write code making mini tool supporting compiler, i run it before compiling. good compiling environment created by this tool, sound improved, balanced and stable.

uploaded:
lekt.exe v2.98.12 256 sop ser
lekt.exe v2.98.12 256 sop noser

try result of my support tool. think sop ser bass better.
seems they are better than sop c4.
-------------------------------
i see they have good balance as v2.98.18 256 acav but more vibration and refined than acav.

all things ok! sop ser better
has added sweetness and clean. i keep wondering if this sweetness is ok... time will tell

---
sop ser has much more ease than sop c4

seems all good things are kept!

try pink floyd "Time", when that school bells rings, it is very annoying (just like real bells?) with
sop c4
less annoying with sop ser
less annoying with ctlx1
less annoying with s4

which is the real school bell!

--------------

jesuscheung wrote: i keep wondering if this sweetness is ok...!

is the sound more smooth than norm?

tested in my good OS: sop ser is best
now in bad OS with running almost things (wifi, ...): sop c4 is best excl. a bit imbalance. sop ser bass more hard, not easy vibrates.

acav by !.exe always good, but lekt.exe sound heigh not enough. sop ser most clarity but sound color of c4 very nice, natural.

hmm... my OS. for got how i compiled c4, seems in windows with all devices/servies, so then natural sound but imbalance. difficult choose environment for compiling, in clean OS sound technically good but not natural, in normal OS sound more natural.

lekt wrote:tested in my good OS: sop ser is best
now in bad OS with running almost things (wifi, ...): sop c4 is best excl. a bit imbalance. sop ser bass more hard, not easy vibrates.

acav by !.exe always good, but lekt.exe sound heigh not enough. sop ser most clarity but sound color of c4 very nice, natural.

hmm... my OS. for got how i compiled c4, seems in windows with all devices/servies, so then natural sound but imbalance. difficult choose environment for compiling, in clean OS sound technically good but not natural, in normal OS sound more natural.

agree. sop ser is technical best. the sound goes up and down almost perfectly.

sop c4 is hard. not easy to vibrate.
sop ser is better more ease- maybe maybe quantity not enough, so the sound is sometimes hard?
(ucx3 maybe richest sound of lekt. the sound is soft also has good tightness)

here acav also has stable+reliable sound. maybe use acav compile environment.

ok.. misjudged... sop ser is not hard. its sound keeps changing! hehe

think some micro details is missing. pretty important... vocal emotion!
technically, it is near perfect

---
ok.. test again... best testing time is during bedtime...

sound isn't smooth anymore... good vocal texture. weight is peaking near ~100%.
piano notes body is never better

"Woman in love" is also superb
"..away" 100% vibrating
"...love" 100% vibrating
"...say" 100% vibrating
"..i" 100% vibrating
"..all" almost full vibration
"..over and over.." almost full vibration

Thank you lekt..
!.exe v2.98.12 256 sop ser has best vibrations yet. Reference version.

ok, sop ser can balancing vibration for 3 frequency ranges using !.exe, coz lekt.exe bass a bit hard. its sound very clarity, most directly.

uploaded:
lekt.exe v2.98.19 256 man1
lekt.exe v2.98.19 256 man2
lekt.exe v2.98.19 256 dmas

use tricks for compiling, prefer my compiling support tool, it can be more effective if i make all compiling tasks into tool's code.

improved vibration.
man1 rich sound, clarity, ok.
man2 more soft, have natural sound but balance lesser.
dmas good power, energy, prefer this version.

try compare with sop ser and sop c4. i think they are good. acav power lesser.

dmas > sop*. sound moment/note body is more or less kept. has added better power + musicality.

man1 vs dmas... hmm...
when man1 hits the key, it softens a little, so clarity seems less.
when dmas hits the key, it is sharp and clear, but has some harshness.
both have equally amazing skills in piano playing. reproduction of piano instrument is differently done.

hmm... prefer man1... more easy with the ear. can play vocal with ease.
(dmas/sop* seems a little tense, some vocal micro is taken away)


----
man1(mellow) > man2(dry)

i guess sweetspot = (dmas(fast) + man1(slow))/2