Tír Na HiFi

OK, enjoy with piano!

i use source for testing piano: Vladimir Horowitz - Complete Recordings on Deutsche Grammophon (got from avaxhm.com). this digital recording very clean, Horowitz's piano technical is "pianist of century". very prefer CD1.
tested micro notes (micro volume sound) with CD1/08.Liszt - Consolation No.3, v2.98 can play, very clean, clarity, although a bit imbalance but it have good focus. weird!
all other lekt versions can not play these notes, small volume as silent but they clarity heared. crispy sound as Mozart also can play, not bad.

v2.98xx have potential, need more vibration for playing classic piano.

can not test by v2.98.x a32, they don't work for me, hehe...

had review code of v2.98.1 a32 and v2.98. tried change 2 statements in loop, vibration better. sound had become more refine and piano have dilicate vibration.

uploaded v2.98.4 256 a32 dif
correction of v2.98.1. try test it for classical piano.

2.98.4 seems sharper more weight with notes.
light notes seems more clear

i can hear piano string (bass string) correctly vibrating.

for best piano, light notes needs to be as good as heavy notes.

yes. 2.98.4 more details. piano musicality kept.

----
2.98.1 maybe better musicality.
2.98.4 heavy notes overshadowing light notes

jesuscheung wrote:...i can hear piano string (bass string) correctly vibrating.
...

like it, piano mechanism is string inside. and its vibration must like as string vibration. i hear this pretty sound.

try testing piano with more different pianists

Horowitz plays some of the best fast notes.

Horowitz loves playing fast notes with finger weight

there are other pianists play fast notes with arm weight

sound is different. (i think arm weight is better. bruce lee style. punch with all body weight)

uploaded:
v2.98.5 256
v2.98.6 256 a32
v2.98.7 256 a256

optimized code: removed two "if" statements in loop, sound better, refined, focus more correct.
v2.98.5 shared for all, code not good as others. a256 must be best, try on different systems, JC. maybe have wasapi pointer 0x...00 and work.

-2.98.6 is better and better with "women in love". vocal is tighter richer. less dry at peak.
-kind of like 2.98.5. little cleaner. (my setup sounds dirty today hehe)
-2.98.7 crackling while music is playing. shall try try on laptop later

(i don't understand why these stupid services "Application Experience", "Application Management", "Device Setup Manager" they like to start randomly at anytime! they make sound dirty, inconsistent. one reason why sound keeps changing. CANNOT STARTUP=DISABLE, BECAUSE SQ SEEMS TO GO BAD... hmm... )

there's compiler. v2.98.5 must be better than v2.98.6 coz it made for multiple of 32, removed one "if" statement in loop. but compiler made it lesser. hmm... v2.98.7 also.

stupid services. same in my case, sometime running, sometime not. and compiling result is random. try learn and absolute disable them, JC, i can not.
many secrets of binary numbers and bitwise operators, code is optimizing everyday. found out new something, testing now.

uploaded v2.98.8 256

compiler makes different SQ of same code. try this version, maybe weight not enough.

lekt wrote:uploaded v2.98.8 256

compiler makes different SQ of same code. try this version, maybe weight not enough.

this version is not good. sounds like it tries too hard. 2.98.5 is natural and better.

also, vocal has absolute focus. xa is like this... cannot hear drums is not good for rock.

actually, vocal is bad. hard, not vibrating.

lekt wrote: stupid services. same in my case, sometime running, sometime not. and compiling result is random. try learn and absolute disable them, JC, i can not.

bill gate doesn't like his services being disabled... hmm!!!!