Page 157 of 299
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 12:39 pm
by lekt
uploaded v2.97 160
use method with specific memory address/pointers. all good things better, bad things lesser. vibration much improved. try it and enjoy!
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 2:07 pm
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:uploaded v2.97 160
use method with specific memory address/pointers. all good things better, bad things lesser. vibration much improved. try it and enjoy!
exactly like you said... all things better!
bad things less... much less! (e.g. my realtek LAN makes hard sound. now is less hard)
superb!
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 2:16 pm
by jesuscheung
2.97 feels like mqn2.82
music is very differently
you know OS makes bad sound...
just don't care.. music is goood
xa makes sure you know your OS sucks
maybe i should buy xs see what it sounds like hehe
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 2:26 pm
by jesuscheung
big challenge to improve on 2.97....
2.97 must be current best
sounds like 2.90.4 + 2.90.9 + nos + 2.9x 160 + 2.4.3
sweet tune, high energy, jitter insensitive, great vibration, big width, earache-free weight...
hard to believe you put everything in one version
-----
what else is missing...
let me think...
almost forgot fibonacci makes beautiful treble
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 2:42 pm
by jesuscheung
starting to notice there is layers in soundstage with 2.97
very naturally presented
need better headphones to enjoy this version
senheisser 540G?
i heard people says it can play atmosphere of live performance of hotel california
maybe ESP-950... seems too expensive
can buy speakers with that money
-----
senheisser doesn't make good phones anymore
hd600 is plastic
hd650 sounds weird
hd700 = beats headphone
hd800 too expensive
in fact, all phones sound weird nowadays... don't know what to buy
what the hell is that rs1?
akg also sounds bright and weird
i remember the good old days $20 sony earphones sounded just analog and fine....
what is happening to the world....
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 4:39 pm
by jesuscheung
lekt, can you do the same magic on 2.95.1 c1 (brother of 2.4.3)?
actually 2.4.3 > 2.95.1 c1
when 2.4.3 is good mood, that bass is almost perfectly tight. very real.
2.95.1 c1 is softer bass. less real.
2.4.3 also has the directness. don't know why ... is it because 2.4.3 is 32bit?
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 5:07 pm
by jesuscheung
uploaded
lekt.exe.manifest
just copy the file to same folder of lekt.exe.
SQ change should happen. experiment
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 6:00 pm
by lekt
jesuscheung wrote:starting to notice there is layers in soundstage with 2.97
very naturally presented
need better headphones to enjoy this version
...
i remember the good old days $20 sony earphones sounded just analog and fine....
what is happening to the world....
tired, was sleeping, not careful test sound of 2.97. just now wakeup, listening and feel it's best of lekt.
very good! but only for system having wasapi data buffer with memory address is multiple of 64 (as your: 0x...40). mine is: 0x...80 and can code for better version. i think depend on system memory capacity wasapi windows give difference pointers. or maybe windows version, not sure, need determine.
maybe buy cheap Sony for testing sound. im using cheap Senheisser MX400. in the old days tried cheap Sony, very natural sound, forgot this model... of course for listening need use expensive, hehe...
with this manipulation of pointers method can make better version for buffer size 256. will try for comparing with 160. very interesting method, mathematically.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 6:34 pm
by lekt
sound have high energy, feel great vocal emotion...
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:42 pm
by sbgk
I can't get it to work without getbuffer and releasebuffer, how is the event getting reset if you don't use these ?