Re: Tweaker's Rash
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:23 pm
For those looking for a Beaglebone Black Rev.B, they are in stock here http://www.watterott.com/en/BeagleBone-Black
Cheers
Aleg
Cheers
Aleg
thats goodAleg wrote:For those looking for a Beaglebone Black Rev.B, they are in stock here http://www.watterott.com/en/BeagleBone-Black
Cheers
Aleg
Nigelnige2000 wrote:thats goodAleg wrote:For those looking for a Beaglebone Black Rev.B, they are in stock here http://www.watterott.com/en/BeagleBone-Black
Cheers
Aleg
i have one on the way should have it by end of wk
still pondering the ultimate/half decent i2s dac solution
i will likely try to shoehorn something cheap together
has anyone figured out how to utilise the mclk input into the bbb yet? i didnt find much about it yet
jkeny wrote:It gets a bit more complicated than just using one high-precision audio clock that everything is synched to - you need 2 such clocks - one for each speed family (44.1 & 48KHz) - if you want to be able to deal with all samplerates?. This means you need to sense the samplerate of the incoming audio stream & switch to the correct audio clock. This can add up to a more complex scenario.
Yes, there are other types of re-clocking - asynchronous clocking that doesn't re-sample the data (as an ASRC does) but it will miss or repeat samples periodically. Maybe this is the scheme being used in the NOS DAC you are looking at? Some people report this type of scheme sounds good, anyway.Aleg wrote:jkeny wrote:It gets a bit more complicated than just using one high-precision audio clock that everything is synched to - you need 2 such clocks - one for each speed family (44.1 & 48KHz) - if you want to be able to deal with all samplerates?. This means you need to sense the samplerate of the incoming audio stream & switch to the correct audio clock. This can add up to a more complex scenario.
I have my eye also on a I2S DAC (a NOS one) that appears to be doing reclocking.
Don't know yet if that will circumvent this issue. Idon't have yet that much info about how it will work.
Cheers
Aleg
jkeny wrote:Yes, there are other types of re-clocking - asynchronous clocking that doesn't re-sample the data (as an ASRC does) but it will miss or repeat samples periodically. Maybe this is the scheme being used in the NOS DAC you are looking at? Some people report this type of scheme sounds good, anyway.Aleg wrote:jkeny wrote:It gets a bit more complicated than just using one high-precision audio clock that everything is synched to - you need 2 such clocks - one for each speed family (44.1 & 48KHz) - if you want to be able to deal with all samplerates?. This means you need to sense the samplerate of the incoming audio stream & switch to the correct audio clock. This can add up to a more complex scenario.
I have my eye also on a I2S DAC (a NOS one) that appears to be doing reclocking.
Don't know yet if that will circumvent this issue. Idon't have yet that much info about how it will work.
Cheers
Aleg
Ah, yes, I suspect it is using an ASRC chip to resample & reclock the audio stream - nothing wrong with that - it will probably work very well particularly with PCM1794 in NOS mode (digital filters turned off)Aleg wrote: It has been announced in this post on runeaudio forum
http://www.runeaudio.com/forum/mpd-is-n ... .html#p384
Not much has been published about it.
Cheers
Aleg
The issue is the read block size. Stuttering occurs when the data can't be read and written fast enough, i.e. if it's "biting off more than it can chew" in one go. If the problem persists with a USB hard drive, it will be because the block size with which the drive was formatted (amount of data read in one go) is too high. I formatted my drive with a small block of 1024 bytes and have perfect playback.
So basically give it smaller bite sized pieces so that it can "chew and swallow" fast enough to feed the data smoothly on into the USB DAC.