Page 16 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:51 pm
by tony
Thanks Nigel will pass that on. Sbgk posted something on the thread about having to write something specifically for amd. Will leave him at it.

One of my core server sticks for some reason the mouse function has stopped working! Wanted to try mqn out on minimal core server but thwarted for the moment. I see 2.60 is available will hopefully try it at some stage this week.

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 3:13 pm
by nige2000
@ tony

that mouse thing can happen iv voltage goes low on your os

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 3:24 pm
by tony
nige2000 wrote:@ tony

that mouse thing can happen iv voltage goes low on your os
Ok those that mean I have to reload the operating system?
I tried the stick on the laptop and got it back to gui using powershell and command prompt but no mouse on that either.

I am assuming the driver is corrupt etc.

The only thing I can think of that happened is that the usb stick powered up but the zuma didnt power up properly as I had not connected the batteries before powering up usb stick.

Fed up with core want optimizer support on R2 it is nicer to use

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:18 pm
by nige2000
Jc and sbgk got banned on CA for no apparent reason to me?
im sure life will go on

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:22 pm
by rdsu
nige2000 wrote:Jc and sbgk got banned on CA for no apparent reason to me?
im sure life will go on
The reason was lack of education, respect and professionalism!

Seems very obvious...

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 5:12 pm
by jkeny
rdsu wrote:
nige2000 wrote:Jc and sbgk got banned on CA for no apparent reason to me?
im sure life will go on
The reason was lack of education, respect and professionalism!

Seems very obvious...
I don't understand either - can you explain what you mean, please?
Do you mean because they got sniffy with Julf?

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 5:24 pm
by rdsu
jkeny wrote:
rdsu wrote:
nige2000 wrote:Jc and sbgk got banned on CA for no apparent reason to me?
im sure life will go on
The reason was lack of education, respect and professionalism!

Seems very obvious...
I don't understand either - can you explain what you mean, please?
Do you mean because they got sniffy with Julf?
At least to me, they are very arrogant and poorly educated.

When we make some question about something that they can't answer, they didn't response well, and starts replying like we are against them...

Just one example:
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-s ... post252143

I didn't listen MQn, but even if SBGK made a great audio player, that doesn't mean nothing...

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 5:30 pm
by nige2000
jkeny wrote:
rdsu wrote:
nige2000 wrote:Jc and sbgk got banned on CA for no apparent reason to me?
im sure life will go on
The reason was

Seems very obvious...
I don't understand either - can you explain what you mean, please?
Do you mean because they got sniffy with Julf?
suppose sniffy could be called a lack of education, respect and professionalism! if you want too

sure some of the stuff posted wasnt necessary

ive seen worse posts get through the net.

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 5:43 pm
by jkeny
rdsu wrote: At least to me, they are very arrogant and poorly educated.

When we make some question about something that they can't answer, they didn't response well, and starts replying like we are against them...

Just one example:
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-s ... post252143

I didn't listen MQn, but even if SBGK made a great audio player, that doesn't mean nothing...
I went to your link & started to read it - found no posts by SGBK. I then looked at the thread title - not MQN thread????

I reckon he was baited by Julf - that's his MO & perhaps that JRiver are a trade account on CA.
I smelled the same whiff of commercialism when I was banned after I was asked by Chris for my credential because I suggested CA readers try RF attenuators on SPDIF cables - I over-reacted (imagine that) but felt it was a staged setup, anyway.

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 5:58 pm
by rdsu
jkeny wrote:
rdsu wrote: At least to me, they are very arrogant and poorly educated.

When we make some question about something that they can't answer, they didn't response well, and starts replying like we are against them...

Just one example:
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f11-s ... post252143

I didn't listen MQn, but even if SBGK made a great audio player, that doesn't mean nothing...
I went to your link & started to read it - found no posts by SGBK. I then looked at the thread title - not MQN thread????
We are talking about sbgk and jesuscheung, and their way of talking with others, not about MQn...

But forget that... :)