MQN

[nige2000]

2.73 raw background best of the new 1024's
no raw background least favorite

maybe a 1024 version of the rel get one that crackles then sounds great
might be worth trying

[sbgk]

2.73 raw background best of the new 1024's
no raw background least favorite

maybe a 1024 version of the rel get one that crackles then sounds great
might be worth trying

which one's that ?

[nige2000]

2.73 raw background best of the new 1024's
no raw background least favorite

maybe a 1024 version of the rel get one that crackles then sounds great
might be worth trying

which one's that ?

think its this one
2.72 448 mem rel get + raw background

[sbgk]

2.73 raw background best of the new 1024's
no raw background least favorite

maybe a 1024 version of the rel get one that crackles then sounds great
might be worth trying

which one's that ?

think its this one
2.72 448 mem rel get + raw background

uploaded 2 versions - one without raw

something wrong with these - have deleted them

[sima66]

I'm leaning more toward 448's.
The smoothness it's unbelievable, but bass is what bothers me! It's not tight enough. My reference is the bass in "2.71 Intel rb 1024 sw".

After a lot of tryings, I finally come to one compromised version. That's the 2.73 448 Intel raw background, but with clock settings at 23220. The clock change from 10158 to 23220 took away a bit of smoothness, but the bass improved a lot.

[sbgk]

I'm leaning more toward 448's.
The smoothness it's unbelievable, but bass is what bothers me! It's not tight enough. My reference is the bass in "2.71 Intel rb 1024 sw".

After a lot of tryings, I finally come to one compromised version. That's the 2.73 448 Intel raw background, but with clock settings at 23220. The clock change from 10158 to 23220 took away a bit of smoothness, but the bass improved a lot.

uploaded a 448 sw version

my favourite at the moment is 1024 background , think raw added an edge.

no scrap that, raw adds more detail so 1024 raw background - agree with nige

[sima66]

I'm leaning more toward 448's.
The smoothness it's unbelievable, but bass is what bothers me! It's not tight enough. My reference is the bass in "2.71 Intel rb 1024 sw".

After a lot of tryings, I finally come to one compromised version. That's the 2.73 448 Intel raw background, but with clock settings at 23220. The clock change from 10158 to 23220 took away a bit of smoothness, but the bass improved a lot.

uploaded a 448 sw version

my favourite at the moment is 1024 background , think raw added an edge.

Crap, can't play the 448 sw!!!

[cvrle59]

I can't play any of 448's so I am stack either with some old 2.71's or 2.73 no raw background if it works. I need to test it first (Nige2000 already doesn't like it).
SBGK, please wake me up, when you shift off 10ms buffer.
Cheers!
Edit:
As soon as I sent this posting in first place, crackling started playing 2.73 no raw background. So I am back to time1....

[Aleg]

I'm leaning more toward 448's.
The smoothness it's unbelievable, but bass is what bothers me! It's not tight enough. My reference is the bass in "2.71 Intel rb 1024 sw".

After a lot of tryings, I finally come to one compromised version. That's the 2.73 448 Intel raw background, but with clock settings at 23220. The clock change from 10158 to 23220 took away a bit of smoothness, but the bass improved a lot.

uploaded a 448 sw version

my favourite at the moment is 1024 background , think raw added an edge.

no scrap that, raw adds more detail so 1024 raw background - agree with nige

2.73 448 rb sw gives a crackling sound
2.73 448 intel raw background just plays fine

2.73 1024 raw background is also great, it has a great sense of ease and calm.

All with 23220 clock rate.

[tony]

both 448 and 1024 versions working fine for me. Clockrate and proaudio sessions well need to read up on all that(probably 100 posts back) as I haven't done any of that to the best of my knowledge. 1024 raw background sounds great but being honest so does 448 version.