Page 143 of 299
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 3:56 am
by lekt
jesuscheung wrote:in asio4all, the min size is 64. i can play it.
in asus native asio driver, i can select 1ms. i can play it too.
and what is result with v2.94 abs?
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 3:58 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:jesuscheung wrote:in asio4all, the min size is 64. i can play it.
in asus native asio driver, i can select 1ms. i can play it too.
and what is result with v2.94 abs?
same as goon heaven..
can play 133. cannot play 132.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 5:59 am
by lekt
JC, why in my case size 288 seems best, much more soft/vibration than others sizes. could you test 288, Pro Audio clockrate 10000.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:13 am
by lekt
no no... not good, bad effect. too smooth/blur = false vibration.
still min size 160 is best again for me.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:20 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:no no... not good, bad effect. too smooth/blur = false vibration.
still min size 160 is best again for me.
160/320/640 is best. pkshan is never wrong with tweaks
you have luck!
audiofire stops making soundcard... it should support 160.
american company?
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:38 am
by jesuscheung
my onboard laptop
Wave format in file is smaller than a WAVEFORMATEX; will zero-pad the last 2 byt
es.
The default period for this device is 30000 hundred-nanoseconds, or 132 frames.
Trying again with periodicity of 36281 hundred-nanoseconds, or 160 frames.
We ended up with a period of 36281 hns or 160 frames.
160 is the king
resolution + quality
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:12 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:
but i only love v2.93 160 style (and v2.93 352 also), slowly/silently tempo. deep feeling. not power/energy as CD sound. although its SQ not good as r2. sometime no need too passion i listen v2.93 160.
...
i think 2.93x is very passionate
some vocal feels like first love whispering sweetly near the ear...
a lot to handle haha
think we need to go back to rock and roll style of 2.90x or 2.4.3
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:35 pm
by jesuscheung
hey goon heaven!!
can you test clockrate=89796?
if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.
the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:20 pm
by goon-heaven
jesuscheung wrote:hey goon heaven!!
can you test clockrate=89796?
if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.
the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
Thanks JC! - another miracle! Can you offer an explanation as to why?
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:24 pm
by jesuscheung
goon-heaven wrote:jesuscheung wrote:hey goon heaven!!
can you test clockrate=89796?
if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.
the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
Thanks JC! - another miracle! Can you offer an explanation as to why?
are you sure? do more testing haha
132*3/44100 = 89796
*3 because i saw pkshan does the same thing to his dac
his dac is best at 640
640*6/44100 = 87075
multiple too much clockrate becomes 6 digits. things start to go wrong