Tír Na HiFi

lekt wrote:

jesuscheung wrote:win8 32 sounds interesting...
i can say goodbye wow64 registry/files/folders.
automatically stripped-OS.

there's will be interesting discussion. as i suspected, intel x64 can work always with 8 bytes or not? or sometime by 2 times with 4 bytes, or 8 times with 1 byte? ask intel, hehe...

uploaded lekt.exe getminsize into TEST_SOUNDCARD folder. old 32bit version from firsts, that can information your min buffer size. tell me what size, JC.

in my case info: "...ended up with a period of 36281 hns or 160 frames."

Active code page: 65001
Deleted file - d:\abcde\music.wav
1 file(s) copied.
Opening .wav file "d:\abcde\music.wav"...
Wave format in file is smaller than a WAVEFORMATEX; will zero-pad the last 2 bytes.
The default period for this device is 30000 hundred-nanoseconds, or 132 frames.
We ended up with a period of 29932 hns or 132 frames.

132 wtf is 132... but it sounds... GREAT

asio4all doesn't have 132...
only 128, 144...

testing... 144 not good. tense
128 is... good!

128buffer + 132clockrate produces wonderful sound stability...
60% better than 8ms (LESS EARACHES for all software)
40% worse than 8ms (LOST WEIGHT with lekt player. weight kept in xa!!)

lekt did you just crack the code of clockrate!!!?

let me test wasapi foobar....
only 130 and 140
130 is goood
140 is not good. tense. too tight...

let me test native asio...
1ms GOOD (crackling little)
2ms GOOD
4ms tense...

hahahaha
lekt you are the king

lol...
BIG THX TO YOU

gonna need 128 for 2.90.8, 2.90.9, 2.90.4, 2.90.2!!!!

now... in terms of earaches + stability:
xa+128+132clockrate+my win2012 = xa+352+352clockrate+pk win7

xa gonna sound a lot better in win7.. haha.. this is exciting... cannot imagine what the vocal will be

who would have guessed 3ms is the one for STX!?! haha

my driver cannot even select 3ms
only 1, 2, 4, 8, 10ms...

this is big step forward.. same effect as upgrading my RCA cables
ha haha hahaha

(i trailed and err, 64, 128, 144, 256, 320.... 1ms, 2ms, 4ms...
just not 132!!!! haha..)

UPDATE
132/44100 = 29932 = good
132*2/44100 = better
132*3/44100 = BEST clockrate hahahaha
richer, density higher, more free, less tense, weight more, everything better... god... pkshan is soooo right...

UPDATE2
think cable/hardware is burning-in the new clockrate... even better.

no wonder some people love 448 mqn... could be the lucky number

uploaded:

v2.93 132
v2.93 160 rc2

try 132 size, must be good for you. recompiled and now 160 r2 SQ much better.
but i only love v2.93 160 style (and v2.93 352 also), slowly/silently tempo. deep feeling. not power/energy as CD sound. although its SQ not good as r2. sometime no need too passion i listen v2.93 160.

buy PCIe card with buffer size 32 as goon-heaven haved. 32 is very small size, very good for coding, much benefit, so then must be best of all sizes.

goon-heaven, where do you now?

2.93 132 not work. no sound. song skip and skip

yes 32 is better. need new soundcard

if 132 not work, 128 is ok...

tested with xa all night, 128 is good.

128 > 256

256's clockrate is difficult to 'power up'.

lekt wrote:although its SQ not good as r2. sometime no need too passion i listen v2.93 160.
...

now with correct clockrate, thx to you

160 is good also... lol...

i notice all buffer sizes < 132 is ok ok ok fine fine fine
doesn't matter too much

130, 128, 64, 1ms, 2ms whatever

goood night

jesuscheung wrote:2.93 132 not work. no sound. song skip and skip

yes 32 is better. need new soundcard

if 132 not work, 128 is ok...

tested with xa all night, 128 is good.

128 > 256

256's clockrate is difficult to 'power up'.

but lekt.exe getminsize works for you? have sound?
OK, maybe mistake in code, 132 no sound in my case of course, that's can not tested work or not, hehe...

i think buffer size setting of foobar is not like as Microsoft wasapi meaning. maybe there's own foobar buffer for preparing its internal data, its not wasapi buffer. wasapi buffer for 44100 Hz is different thing. not sure.

lekt wrote:uploaded:

v2.93 132
v2.93 160 rc2

try 132 size, must be good for you. recompiled and now 160 r2 SQ much better.
but i only love v2.93 160 style (and v2.93 352 also), slowly/silently tempo. deep feeling. not power/energy as CD sound. although its SQ not good as r2. sometime no need too passion i listen v2.93 160.

buy PCIe card with buffer size 32 as goon-heaven haved. 32 is very small size, very good for coding, much benefit, so then must be best of all sizes.

goon-heaven, where do you now?

Huh? What? You called?

I get same message as JC - 29932 hns or 132 frames (buffer size set to 32)

uploaded lekt.exe v2.94 abs

for all buffer sizes. user can input buffer size which he wants by edit .bat file, for example:
@echo off
Title LEKT MUSIC PLAYER
lekt.exe 160 "C:\music\abc.wav"
lekt.exe 128 "C:\music\abc.wav"
lekt.exe 144 "C:\music\abc.wav"

so then can get minimal buffer size of sound card, correctly size. try test and compare.
interesting, this testing version even better than other. haha...
balance, vibration, bass,... OK. simple algorithm. hmm... seems provocation of compiler, JC.

well come goon-heaven author of this thread coming back now !