Tír Na HiFi

no no... r2 seems better now...

no wait...

r1 better. r2 seems airy but thinner also little bit nervous?
r1 has solid vocal.

actually, i could try 176 (352/2)...
don't have much experience in 176 (4ms)... only tested with xa

r2 seems better now again... hahaha
tough call...

need (r1+r2)/2

2.93 and 2.93.1 more relaxing than 2.93 rc1 and rc2

2.93 and 2.93.1. need more vocal texture.

2.90.4 and 2.90.8 are also relaxing

2.90.9 is still little hard. trying to improve my OS for it... have nothing yet hehe
i think 2.90.9 make good pink floyd

jesuscheung wrote:actually, i could try 176 (352/2)...
don't have much experience in 176 (4ms)... only tested with xa

OK, will build version for taking minimal buffer size, and version wich can input buffer size as user want. problem in that variable parameter not good as constant value in code. so then you will tell me what your min size.

uploaded v2.93 160 rc1

tested. why 160 have more weight of drum in my case? anyway, 160 still better, minimal size.

lekt wrote:

jesuscheung wrote:actually, i could try 176 (352/2)...
don't have much experience in 176 (4ms)... only tested with xa

OK, will build version for taking minimal buffer size, and version wich can input buffer size as user want. problem in that variable parameter not good as constant value in code. so then you will tell me what your min size.

uploaded v2.93 160 rc1

tested. why 160 have more weight of drum in my case? anyway, 160 still better, minimal size.

damn... 2.93 160 rc1 missing dll in my laptop!

2.4.3 160 is easily better everything than 352 with my onboard laptop

jesuscheung wrote:damn... 2.93 160 rc1 missing dll in my laptop!

2.4.3 160 is easily better everything than 352 with my onboard laptop

what dll? from v2.92 lekt player use msvcr120.dll (from vs2013 or Visual C++ Redistributable Packages for Visual Studio 2013)
previouse versions used msvcr110.dll (from vs2012 or Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2012 Update 3), depend x64 or x86 also. first versions builded for windows 32 bit.
will back to 32 bit versions, JC. benefit for manipulation pointers, only 4 bytes, operations with them faster than 8 bytes pointer of x64 concept.

lekt wrote:

jesuscheung wrote:damn... 2.93 160 rc1 missing dll in my laptop!

2.4.3 160 is easily better everything than 352 with my onboard laptop

what dll? from v2.92 lekt player use msvcr120.dll (from vs2013 or Visual C++ Redistributable Packages for Visual Studio 2013)
previouse versions used msvcr110.dll (from vs2012 or Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2012 Update 3), depend x64 or x86 also. first versions builded for windows 32 bit.
will back to 32 bit versions, JC. benefit for manipulation pointers, only 4 bytes, operations with them faster than 8 bytes pointer of x64 concept.

yes yes. 2.4.3 is 32bit! true potential! magic

maybe win8 32bit edition is better?
win8 64bit wraps 32 into 64 all the time... not a true 64 OS

win8 32 sounds interesting...
i can say goodbye wow64 registry/files/folders.
automatically stripped-OS.

jesuscheung wrote:win8 32 sounds interesting...
i can say goodbye wow64 registry/files/folders.
automatically stripped-OS.

there's will be interesting discussion. as i suspected, intel x64 can work always with 8 bytes or not? or sometime by 2 times with 4 bytes, or 8 times with 1 byte? ask intel, hehe...

uploaded lekt.exe getminsize into TEST_SOUNDCARD folder. old 32bit version from firsts, that can information your min buffer size. tell me what size, JC.

in my case info: "...ended up with a period of 36281 hns or 160 frames."