Tír Na HiFi

lekt wrote:not correct sound usualy:
clean <-> hard/dry
dirty <-> soft/wet

need soft/wet but in cleaness, otherwise sound will be dirty, not detailed.

feel v2.90.15 is clean but dry, little. here's not enough vibration (and micro vibration) in its cleaness. so need keep its clean/hard/dry and improve vibration/micro vibration. so then sound will be more soft/wet.
reason: not good balancing as v2.4.3.
will try as i think. not easy, hehe...

yes. same here. 2.90.15 is on dry side. also thin. because thin, so 0.5% nervous.

right now for me, best sound for me is 2.90.4. soft. clean. highest quantity in vibration.
2nd best = 2.90.9
3rd best = 2.4.3 MOD, s4, rax no zi MOD, mqn.exe2.2 MOD

win7+xa1080a = most delicate vocal + highest quantity texture in vocal.
king of vocal. not as analog as lekt or mqn. maybe intel C++, sse make less analog.

my 2012 only makes analog vocal. no quality in texture.

lol... i understand why my setup is harder than norm....

harddisk temperature +10c in summer
GPU temperature was 35c in winter... now 55c

bye bye ATI GPU...

PC audio is such a pain in ass....
we need to move back to CD player haha

uploaded: v2.90.16 256 and v2.90.17 256

i see good vocal of these versions. good musical emotion!
v2.90.17 bass can play separate notes, like as solo playing, prefer this bass.
if sound too hard then bass can't vibrate, if too soft then bass can't play detailed and speedly notes. need just enough softness for sound.
feel v2.90.17 better, of course if can be a bit more soft then bass will be perfect. make MOD version for it, maybe you can get better softness. but i think not easy touch its bass, hehe... try it.

lekt wrote:uploaded: v2.90.16 256 and v2.90.17 256

i see good vocal of these versions. good musical emotion!
v2.90.17 bass can play separate notes, like as solo playing, prefer this bass.

yes! 2.90.17 > 2.90.16
maybe new best? need more time to tell... every 2.90x is very good. only small difference.

lekt wrote: if sound too hard then bass can't vibrate, if too soft then bass can't play detailed and speedly notes. need just enough softness for sound.
feel v2.90.17 better, of course if can be a bit more soft then bass will be perfect. make MOD version for it, maybe you can get better softness. but i think not easy touch its bass, hehe... try it.

yes yes yes.... sometimes 2.90.9 vibrates very good. sometimes PC is too hard it doesn't vibrate...

for me... more soft = more vibration. so, 2.90.4 has highest vibration now in summer hehe

everyday is more hot... sound is changing also

in winter, i remember sound was soft.
i tweaked too much in winter. sound becomes too tight.
now is summer -> too hard.

for me, 2.90x is very good balance. only hard or soft

lekt wrote:...
feel v2.90.17 better, of course if can be a bit more soft then bass will be perfect. make MOD version for it, maybe you can get better softness. but i think not easy touch its bass, hehe... try it.

this bass is great. must keep it

i see some software with poor bass, their treble is also poor.

2.90x treble is not perfect. but good enough
good treble needs $$$$
nowadays, a good piano needs > 50K... <50K = questionable treble

prefer v.2.90.17 sound, vocal and bass have great emotion, songs give good sadness. but in my case little intense, maybe my OS imbalance.
think can enjoy good music sound only in good weather days, air have reasonable humidity, speakers can correctly vibrate and sound wave can correctly transfer in air.

lekt wrote:prefer v.2.90.17 sound, vocal and bass have great emotion, songs give good sadness. but in my case little intense, maybe my OS imbalance.
think can enjoy good music sound only in good weather days, air have reasonable humidity, speakers can correctly vibrate and sound wave can correctly transfer in air.

yes, seems little intense. only little

lekt wrote:....
think can enjoy good music sound only in good weather days, air have reasonable humidity, speakers can correctly vibrate and sound wave can correctly transfer in air.

this is so weird...
i can understand speakers need good air+space.
but why headphones? it is right next to my ears hehehe

JC, i see v2.33.1 256 Fibonacci have very pretty sound, vocal emotion great. its sound is clean, balancing, many things are correct. only not much vibration as last versions. could you retest it, make more vibration by MOD. im learning its code now, need improve its SQ, will optimize in C native.

lekt wrote:JC, i see v2.33.1 256 Fibonacci have very pretty sound, vocal emotion great. its sound is clean, balancing, many things are correct. only not much vibration as last versions. could you retest it, make more vibration by MOD. im learning its code now, need improve its SQ, will optimize in C native.

hehe since when... cannot remember... let me listen listen

oh yes! fibonacci has great vocal. same musicality like old days

weird... crackling...
thin sound just like old days...
good weight in mellow form....
i think some vibration is incorrect, so the tune is not very sunny. i think you can fix it.

yes yes... fibonacci is very good... not hard. good softness. very very easy to listen. more easy than 2.90x
usually thin sound is easier to listen. i like thin sound.

yes yes... fibonacci is pure quality.
sometimes i think 2.90x has more quantity than is needed. 2.90x is quantity + quality.

go make a new fibonacci... waiting ....




-----UPDATE -----
relistening the old versions... notice interesting things

2.3x
thin sound. very easy to listen.

2.4x
music is rich and slower! i like slow music!

2.5x
music is faster...

2.6x
?

2.7x
2 files model. has complex vibration. can make expensive sound. tempo more stable than 1 file model.

2.8x
?

2.9x
current best balance. rich + direct + real.