Tír Na HiFi

lekt, can you make a version (2.90.2+2.90.3)/2??

2.90.2 better tune/dynamic, but little bit sound 3D
2.90.3 not 3D, but tune is less

so close

now i've lesser time to deverlope lekt's code. only optimized compiler, result better.
v2.91.x have good algorithm, interesting work with pointers. maybe you have 8GB RAM (in my case 4GB RAM), need large address of memory, otherwise it don't work for you. will go back to v2.91 later.

uploaded:
v2.90.5 256
v2.90.6 256
v2.90.7 256

i think v2.90.6 and v2.90.7 better than v2.90 MOD. more true bass, natural treble.
make MOD versions for them, JC. some deffects maybe can be removed after your MOD working. im waiting..

lekt wrote:now i've lesser time to deverlope lekt's code. only optimized compiler, result better.
v2.91.x have good algorithm, interesting work with pointers. maybe you have 8GB RAM (in my case 4GB RAM), need large address of memory, otherwise it don't work for you. will go back to v2.91 later.

uploaded:
v2.90.5 256
v2.90.6 256
v2.90.7 256

i think v2.90.6 and v2.90.7 better than v2.90 MOD. more true bass, natural treble.
make MOD versions for them, JC. some deffects maybe can be removed after your MOD working. im waiting..

quickly tested....

2.90.6 and 2.90.7 make hard edges in treble e.g. guitar.
2.90.5 has smooth round edges in treble e.g. guitar.

wait... something wrong with my OS.
i think my OS has too much vibration.
2.90.6 and 2.90.7 has increased vibration.
vibration+vibration = liquid sound. i can tell difference hahaha

uploaded MODS of 2.90.5, 2.90.6, 2.90.7

yes, something is wrong with 2.90 MOD. artificial. also dirty noise

sometimes i think 2.90.2 is correct. sometimes not.

i think 2.90.2 is telling me my OS is wrong. not sure.

2.90.6 > 2.90.7. more transparent.
2.90.7 seems very little bit excess -> false smooth.


prefer 2.90.5 and 2.90.6
not sure which is better yet

jesuscheung wrote:yes, something is wrong with 2.90 MOD. artificial. also dirty noise

sometimes i think 2.90.2 is correct. sometimes not.

i think 2.90.2 is telling me my OS is wrong. not sure.

2.90.6 > 2.90.7. more transparent.
2.90.7 seems very little bit excess -> false smooth.

in my case v2.90.7 is best, best bass. my speakers never vibrates as when v2.90.7 playing, other things clarity, clean. true bass?
feel 2.90.7 more like as sound from tape source, wide frequency range, especially low frequency.
with MODs need test more.

lekt wrote:

jesuscheung wrote:yes, something is wrong with 2.90 MOD. artificial. also dirty noise

sometimes i think 2.90.2 is correct. sometimes not.

i think 2.90.2 is telling me my OS is wrong. not sure.

2.90.6 > 2.90.7. more transparent.
2.90.7 seems very little bit excess -> false smooth.

in my case v2.90.7 is best, best bass. my speakers never vibrates as when v2.90.7 playing, other things clarity, clean. true bass?
feel 2.90.7 more like as sound from tape source, wide frequency range, especially low frequency.
with MODs need test more.

yes. very possible 2.90.7 is telling me my OS has excess

recently i notice ram/cpu/gpu offset voltages makes more vibrations.
i pushed to maximum vibrations.
i very careful tested. still wrong.
very difficult to test voltages with dirty power.
pretty sure...
yes!!!
ram voltage is wrong! back to normal! only +0.05v more, vibration +3% but incorrect!

2.90.7 has great bass. bass>treble. tune is sweet but doesn't shine as much as 2.90.2/2.90.5
2.90.6 and 2.90.7 sound depth enough?

lekt wrote:feel 2.90.7 more like as sound from tape source, wide frequency range, especially low frequency.
with MODs need test more.

now that you tell me... yes... i hear huge frequency range in bass!

need more weight/depth.

2.90.2 is more shinny because it is missing some bass frequency range??

learning something everyday

now that i think about it

i used to like 2.79.2, it is most shinny. but also less in frequency range!

EDIT

starting to appreciate 2.90.7!!

clock rate 10000 in your case?

seem v2.90.7 have defect. still now detected only imbalance, little. high and midle zone seems more rich than norm, maybe need more thin. but why sound very clarity, vocal sweet, clarity. totally i feel its sound very like as tape cassette, haha...
learn more its sound, seems correct and good. especialy sound texture.

lekt wrote:clock rate 10000 in your case?

seem v2.90.7 have defect. still now detected only imbalance, little. high and midle zone seems more rich than norm, maybe need more thin. but why sound very clarity, vocal sweet, clarity. totally i feel its sound very like as tape cassette, haha...
learn more its sound, seems correct and good. especialy sound texture.

2.90.7 is very interesting. reminds me of older versions.
height not much. but sound rises up very good.
width is big.

little bit excess. also very airy with good texture. yes sweet. great musicality
dirty kind of analog sound like cassette.
2.90.2/2.90.5 feels like CD player analog. very clean