Page 13 of 299

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:00 am
by jesuscheung
2.7.1 v3
stuck. no sound.

2.7.1. v2
-higher sound density. still mellow and airy.
-very easy on headphones. think needs a bit more power.
-vocal vibration is good needs stronger vibration more power.
-flow better
-clearer, cleaner
-stage seems excellent. simple and focus. best so far? need more listening
-overall need very slightly more weight/power/emotion! but don't add not too much. after you do this, i think it will be a reference version.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:24 am
by jesuscheung
2.7.1. v2
piano much better. more and more correct. need stronger/longer impact but keep the weight. not sure i am making any sense.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:58 am
by goon-heaven
jesuscheung wrote:2.7.1 v3
stuck. no sound.

2.7.1. v2
-higher sound density. still mellow and airy.
-very easy on headphones.
-vocal vibration is good
-flow better
-clearer, cleaner
-stage seems excellent. simple and focus. best so far
+1. Clean. Good vibration. Best yet.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:05 am
by lekt
jesuscheung wrote:2.7.1. v2
piano much better. more and more correct. need stronger/longer impact but keep the weight. not sure i am making any sense.
vibration, JC. have some methods impvove vibration (including use hardware technologue, compiler setting), but they always affect to soundstage, change sound texture. it mean they are not good, not correct, or wrong way i used. optimization code is best way. im trying do this.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:54 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:2.7.1. v2
piano much better. more and more correct. need stronger/longer impact but keep the weight. not sure i am making any sense.
vibration, JC. have some methods impvove vibration (including use hardware technologue, compiler setting), but they always affect to soundstage, change sound texture. it mean they are not good, not correct, or wrong way i used. optimization code is best way. im trying do this.
when i have time, going to experiment turning off "Hardware Prefetcher" and "Adjacent Cache Line Prefetch" in bios, see if SQ will be better.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:57 am
by jesuscheung
disabled both "Hardware Prefetcher" and "Adjacent Cache Line Prefetch".
definitely have some positive effects on stage. much better control on brightness. seems better clarity.
also some negative effects. less refined on small things. some added earaches.
tested with MQn, and lekt player.
very interesting. not all bad. not all good.

you are right. hardware techs have quite an effect on stage.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:31 pm
by jesuscheung
jesuscheung wrote: 2.1.7.2
....
-overall need very slightly more weight/power/emotion! but don't add not too much. after you do this, i think it will be a reference version.
sorry. misjudged the weight. had a bad tweak.

relisten to 2.1.7.2
treble a bit bright. the tune needs fix.
bass ok as always.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:45 pm
by jesuscheung
hey goon-heaven, we are confused with the version number. 2.71 v2 is MQn. lekt's is 2.1.7.2... haha

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:19 pm
by goon-heaven
Yup Brian. I am easily confused. Haha

I meant lekt.exe1644 v2.17.2 1024.*

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:25 pm
by jkeny
Lekt, I startred a thread on an I2S error which afflicts all DACs & which is solvable in software viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2485

I thought you might be interested in trying an implementation of it in your player to check what it sounds like?
PM or post if you want to follow it up