Page 120 of 299
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:27 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:jesuscheung wrote:2.84 is poisoning! listen once. addicted. no player has as much bass as 2.84. quantity (and quality).
for bass, 2.84 wins all players in my R2
v2.84 bass have hifi potential. found out little bug in code, but in loop, dangerious. that's made sound blur, shadow.
optimized its code, only this little bug, kept all its original code.
uploaded lekt.exe v2.86 1024
sound much better, bass is real, good focus. now sound more clean and clarity.
try it and enjoy!
better! think this fixes the 'blur'.
king of rock!
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:36 am
by jesuscheung
the bug of 2.84 makes stage really really good. i was probably listening to 3D effect
2.86 less 3D. but more natural.
(3D soundstage seems easy to make. just need a bug)
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:53 am
by lekt
jesuscheung wrote:the bug of 2.84 makes stage really really good. i was probably listening to 3D effect
2.86 less 3D. but more natural.
(3D soundstage seems easy to make. just need a bug)
v2.84 have a bit 3D effect, when balance is true sound have become more "simple", natural. easy confuse 3D with air.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:56 am
by jesuscheung
had enough fun with 2.84.
2.85.2 is more correct.
i have forgotten in the old days i used to mess around with svchost making 3D effects.
2.86 and 2.84 have rock solid bass/drum. feels very real.
EDIT
now, which is better?
2.86 or 2.85.2?
difficult. hehe
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:03 am
by lekt
for comparing i uploaded v2.84 1024 brother, like as v2.84 99.9%, only fixed a little, noise not fixed, but have interesting air as v2.84. maybe correct and good.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:09 am
by jesuscheung
2.86 vs 2.85.2
small difference in tempo.
2.86 resolution > 2.85.2.
2.86 micro-vibration more. so more mellow.
they sound almost the same.
2.86 slightly better. it has more correct power.
2.85.2 not strong enough when needed.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:14 am
by jesuscheung
2.84 vs 2.84 brother
brother better air.
brother noise is more.
brother less 3D.
prefer 2.84. although not true 3D, still the best I heard. can fool most people i think.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:17 am
by lekt
jesuscheung wrote:...2.85.2 is more correct.
...now, which is better?
2.86 or 2.85.2?
difficult. hehe
v2.85.2 balance more correct (a bit only), used other method with 8 threads, big file size. it will be better v2.86 after recompile, as made for v2.86.
think need resolve problem with pops. easy but not easy, SQ will be reduced a bit.
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 4:57 pm
by jesuscheung
jesuscheung wrote:
Fri Dec 27, 2013 3:54 pm
2.55 vs 2.55.2 256
2.55 natural 3D stage. 2.55.2 natural sample stage with higher resolution detail.
.......
lol... back then, my OS was totally 3D, and 2.55 was 'natural' 3D.
today, 2.55 is just flat stage. a little bit 3D effect
wish i didn't delete that OS backup. i could have listened 2.86, 2.85.2 on it...
time flies!
today, 2.85.2/2.86 > 2.55. 10 times better
Re: lekt player
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 5:09 pm
by jesuscheung
one difference:
2.85.2 tighter
2.86 looser
when OS feels tight, 2.86 is better.
when OS feels loose, 2.85.2 is better.