Page 105 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:57 pm
by jkeny
tony wrote:
Is that another one? I have used raw Ok checked it out see there is two more to download!
Ah Tony, it's already an hour old - try to keep up :)
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:09 am
by nige2000
jkeny wrote:tony wrote:
Is that another one? I have used raw Ok checked it out see there is two more to download!
Ah Tony, it's already an hour old - try to keep up :)
haha
many times ive tested versions then go online to give feedback to discover theres a new set of versions...
ahhh!!!!........... back to the drawing board
like these recent versions
been a good few days for MQn
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:11 am
by tony
jkeny wrote:tony wrote:
Is that another one? I have used raw Ok checked it out see there is two more to download!
Ah Tony, it's already an hour old - try to keep up :)
I am bleedin tryin it don't get any easier. Cut paste move usb key to audiopc cut paste rename copy. Will need an ssd shortly to house all these versions!
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:16 am
by wushuliu
Prefer 2.71 no raw of the three new versions today, the other two sound the same. Very much diminishing returns territory.
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:39 am
by cvrle59
Today's versions are step back IMO. I didn't even try raw other, but I did background raw and no raw.
The sound is tick and slow, details lost, no texture on the bass, the bass is bumy on some critical tracks, focus on voices is kind of lost, voices are not sweet any more.... I just don't like them.
I am back to my hero, 2.71 intel or V2 to enjoy some music. 2.71 intel can get into the heart of the music.
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:38 am
by Diapason
{Moderator Note: I've moved this thread back to General for the time being until everyone has access to the Computer Audio.}
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:11 pm
by nige2000
Thanks simon
I have to try no raw yet
But I did think that raw last night sounded very real
Just thinking about how increasing the ability to display higher resolution of these 16 bit tracks
will have negative effect because they will display every recording and mastering errors
do we want studio monitor's?
Do we want colored sound?
any thoughts?
As Jack Nicholson says "you cant handle the truth!!!!"
applogies for the bad film quote cant help myself sometimes
not that I think raw Is perfect or anything
what is perfect anyway?
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:17 pm
by cvrle59
I need to spend more time to listen tonight, but I did not like the bass at all, I mean in the "background" versions.
If you can make my Naim/Harbeth combo to deliver bummy bass without texture, especially with acoustic bass, something is definitely wrong.
SBGK will understand why, I guess.
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:07 pm
by LowOrbit
[quote="nige2000"]Thanks simon
I have to try no raw yet
But I did think that raw last night sounded very real
Just thinking about how increasing the ability to display higher resolution of these 16 bit tracks
will have negative effect because they will display every recording and mastering errors
do we want studio monitor's?
Do we want colored sound?
any thoughts?
quote]
If we can achieve that level of replay I will happily live with the imperfections.
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:02 pm
by LowOrbit
Just had a quick listen.
2.71 8.1-R2 Raw Other - Wow. Balance is a little bright but the level of detail and musical "speed" is exciting. Makes me want to give up work for the afternoon and turn the phone off, for some serious listening.