Page 102 of 299

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:29 am
by lekt
uploaded:
lektshell.exe1644 v2.75.1 256 s11

i think micro vibration of bass of s11 is very good, not like as other versions. try it!

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 5:21 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:uploaded:
lektshell.exe1644 v2.75.1 256 s11

i think micro vibration of bass of s11 is very good, not like as other versions. try it!
yes!!! this vibration makes better high density treble. vocal feels more real/present. good for piano. need more more more this kind of vibration for piano.

think s4 soundstage most stable+natural+tidy. s11 less tidy. s11 doesn't feel too natural (maybe 3d effect)

s4 makes rich airy sound. richer than all other software players. at least twice as much.
s11 don't have the same richness.

s11 has good mellow while sharp + real/present. s4/s5/s8 not as real/present.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:44 am
by jesuscheung
messing around with ram timing again....
confused.

in terms of natural soundstage:

faster timing
s11 > s8 > s5 > s4

slower timing
s4 > s5 > s8 > s11

need more listening... digital world has too much power over SQ quality....

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:03 am
by jesuscheung
very strange...

faster ram timing + realtime + timer resolution=0.5ms = best sound for s11

usually when i use this aggressive setting, it compresses sound + 3D effects on most software players.
with s11, this setting expand sound size + more natural soundstage. very very positive result. i never had this experience

EDIT
don't need realtime.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:33 am
by lekt
i see s11 balance not good as s8, s5. it sound focus need adust a bit so sound can more clean, more clarity. don't need tweak for s11, it have some not correct elements.
only its bass have good micro vibration and air. my CD Player have "more" bass, of cource correct bass. wait for me...

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 4:50 pm
by jesuscheung
i think s11 has correct depth. not too much. just enough
vocal has full lung power.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 9:44 pm
by lekt
i used new method, back to 1 file model, sound depth better, more air.

uploaded 2 versions:
lekt.exe1644 v2.76 256 raw 1 file
lekt.exe1644 v2.76.1 256 1 file

need run only one file lekt.exe, for example content in .bat playlist file:
@echo off
Title LEKT MUSIC PLAYER
lekt.exe --file "D:\Music\track1.wav"
lekt.exe --file "D:\Music\track2.wav"

v2.76 raw vibration lesser but sound have many correct and good things.
try them and enjoy!

Re: lekt player

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:14 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:i used new method, back to 1 file model, sound depth better, more air.

uploaded 2 versions:
lekt.exe1644 v2.76 256 raw 1 file
lekt.exe1644 v2.76.1 256 1 file

need run only one file lekt.exe, for example content in .bat playlist file:
@echo off
Title LEKT MUSIC PLAYER
lekt.exe --file "D:\Music\track1.wav"
lekt.exe --file "D:\Music\track2.wav"

v2.76 raw vibration lesser but sound have many correct and good things.
try them and enjoy!
2.76x feels like 2.4.3! nice. when music is correct, resolution is only secondary.

2.76x has best energy like 2.4.3. totally musical. no excess in resolution. love this style.

-yes 1 file model has advantages. bass, treble and mid have correct balance.
(i think balance>resolution. when balance not correct. can never be satisfied no matter how much higher is resolution.)
-in 2 files model, vibration can be huge. balance is more difficult.

2.76 vs 2.76 raw...
difficult choice. very very close in quality.
-think 2.76 raw's depth > 0.001% than norm -> stretches width unnaturally by 0.001% -> makes tune less sweet. (same negative effect like e.g. 2.72)
-2.76 has correct tune.

prefer 2.76 (for now.. hehe)

thx!

Re: lekt player

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:25 am
by jesuscheung
think still need more energy! if possible
love energy

2.76 not enough weight (coz depth not enough)

Re: lekt player

Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:37 am
by jesuscheung
just listening to 2.4.3 again. try use 2.4.3's depth. very correct.