not surprising - isn't the reclocking on the Soekris not as directnige2000 wrote:oh btw put a potato 74374 to reclock on it too, much bigger improvement here than on soekris !
How much of sonic gap now between Soekris & 1387?
not surprising - isn't the reclocking on the Soekris not as directnige2000 wrote:oh btw put a potato 74374 to reclock on it too, much bigger improvement here than on soekris !
yes this is far more direct, and obviously benefits much more,jkeny wrote:not surprising - isn't the reclocking on the Soekris not as directnige2000 wrote:oh btw put a potato 74374 to reclock on it too, much bigger improvement here than on soekris !
dunno i have them in different systems atm, i wouldnt like to guessHow much of sonic gap now between Soekris & 1387?
In passive I/V the TDA1387 is always going to be ps sensitive, due to the 'pull-up' current source internally. That's why I ended up using hundreds of thousands of uF on my earlier DAC designs. Active I/V solves the ps sensitivity to my satisfaction, discrete being top of the pile for active I/Vs.nige2000 wrote: however the tda1387 is extremely susceptible to ps and the quality of the i2s
Ah rightabraxalito wrote:In passive I/V the TDA1387 is always going to be ps sensitive, due to the 'pull-up' current source internally. That's why I ended up using hundreds of thousands of uF on my earlier DAC designs. Active I/V solves the ps sensitivity to my satisfaction, discrete being top of the pile for active I/Vs.nige2000 wrote: however the tda1387 is extremely susceptible to ps and the quality of the i2s