MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
grisaia
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:05 pm

Re: MQN

Post by grisaia »

sbgk wrote:tried to simplify the install

download mqn haswell.zip

extract the files to c:\musicplayer

if you use another directory change the directory in mqn.bat

@echo off

cd c:\musicplayer

Title MQn - Just good music

then double click setupmqnparam.bat and close the window manually

decide which version of mqnplay is required win 10 or w2012 r2 (also works for win 8.1)

rename the selected mqnplay.exe and mqnloader.exe and mqncontrol.exe files so the description suffix is removed

select wav files/copy to clipboard and double click mqn.bat to play the music

more details on how to play non wav files here

http://randytsuch-audio.blogspot.co.uk/ ... setup.html
Do we still have to use hex editor to modify device string?
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

grisaia wrote:
sbgk wrote:tried to simplify the install

download mqn haswell.zip

extract the files to c:\musicplayer

if you use another directory change the directory in mqn.bat

@echo off

cd c:\musicplayer

Title MQn - Just good music

then double click setupmqnparam.bat and close the window manually

decide which version of mqnplay is required win 10 or w2012 r2 (also works for win 8.1)

rename the selected mqnplay.exe and mqnloader.exe and mqncontrol.exe files so the description suffix is removed

select wav files/copy to clipboard and double click mqn.bat to play the music

more details on how to play non wav files here

http://randytsuch-audio.blogspot.co.uk/ ... setup.html
Do we still have to use hex editor to modify device string?
no, the above steps is all you need to do.

the device string is stored in mqnparam.txt which is created/overwritten when you run setupmqnparam.bat
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

218/91/72
Bass is too fat and out of balance to other tonal ranges and becomes too overpowering.

217/89/70 was better balanced
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

Aleg wrote:218/91/72
Bass is too fat and out of balance to other tonal ranges and becomes too overpowering.

217/89/70 was better balanced
did you try 217/90/71, have put them back up ?
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

sbgk wrote:
Aleg wrote:218/91/72
Bass is too fat and out of balance to other tonal ranges and becomes too overpowering.

217/89/70 was better balanced
did you try 217/90/71, have put them back up ?
217/90/71 isn't so overpowering, but still prefer 217/89/70.
In 90/71 the bass becomes less distinct, loses some of the definition that is so nicely present in 89/70.

Am using Schubert Rosamunde string quartet played by Alban Berg quartet, and listen to the balance between the first / second violin and the cello. The cello has a clear role but with 218 it overpowers the first/second violin and disturbs the balance of the piece.
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

Aleg wrote:
sbgk wrote:
Aleg wrote:218/91/72
Bass is too fat and out of balance to other tonal ranges and becomes too overpowering.

217/89/70 was better balanced
did you try 217/90/71, have put them back up ?
217/90/71 isn't so overpowering, but still prefer 217/89/70.
In 90/71 the bass becomes less distinct, loses some of the definition that is so nicely present in 89/70.

Am using Schubert Rosamunde string quartet played by Alban Berg quartet, and listen to the balance between the first / second violin and the cello. The cello has a clear role but with 218 it overpowers the first/second violin and disturbs the balance of the piece.
ok, thanks
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

tried a rewrite program and managed to get a reduction in treble. Shall try and get a good version and a bad version. The bad version can be used for testing regenerators etc, if the treble is restored then the regenerator is working. If the regenerators can't restore the treble then there is some other mechanism at work that affects the sound.
janh
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:24 pm

Re: MQN

Post by janh »

Aleg wrote: 217/90/71 isn't so overpowering, but still prefer 217/89/70.
In 90/71 the bass becomes less distinct, loses some of the definition that is so nicely present in 89/70.
+1.
217/89/70 is very fine, giving a nice sound.
Last edited by janh on Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gigabyte H97M-D3H with PPA OCXO module. i7-4790T, 800MHz. 8GB Ram, 800MHz.
PPA 2-rail LPSU & Pico. JCAT battery for OS-SSD and PPA v3 USBcard.
Server 2012 R2, AO 1.40. APL HiFi DAC-S, upd. Only use 1644 .wav
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

building on v217, v219 is more free flowing, sounds good with jazz, anyway.
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

sbgk wrote:building on v217, v219 is more free flowing, sounds good with jazz, anyway.
Get an application error with mqnloader v73 at instruction 0x4000103b referencing 0x09d87000 memory could not be written. Only loads first track.
Is on win 2012r2
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
Post Reply