still not got the punch that v75 has, might have to settle for v75. I thought the v80's were a better technical solution, but the sound is a bit flatter than v75.elaprince wrote:Aleg did you try v82 yet??
What do you think?
Thanks
MQN
Re: MQN
+1sbgk wrote:I thought the v80's were a better technical solution, but the sound is a bit flatter than v75.
V82 is indeed flatter than v75, for me most noticeable on female voices.
Would happily settle for v75
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
Re: MQN
yup, v75 seems to be a freak of nature, really gets a grip of the music, on with the control update then.Aleg wrote:+1sbgk wrote:I thought the v80's were a better technical solution, but the sound is a bit flatter than v75.
V82 is indeed flatter than v75, for me most noticeable on female voices.
Would happily settle for v75
Re: MQN
+1sbgk wrote: yup, v75 seems to be a freak of nature, really gets a grip of the music, on with the control update then.
Gigabyte H97M-D3H with PPA OCXO module. i7-4790T, 800MHz. 8GB Ram, 800MHz.
PPA 2-rail LPSU & Pico. JCAT battery for OS-SSD and PPA v3 USBcard.
Server 2012 R2, AO 1.40. APL HiFi DAC-S, upd. Only use 1644 .wav
PPA 2-rail LPSU & Pico. JCAT battery for OS-SSD and PPA v3 USBcard.
Server 2012 R2, AO 1.40. APL HiFi DAC-S, upd. Only use 1644 .wav
-
adolfo.a.aguiar
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 4:22 pm
Re: MQN
One more vote for v75.
I have borrowed an Audiophilleo to compare my Hugo USB input vs SPDIF.
With the USB input, all the players available to me worked fine. MQn > HQ Player > Foobar.
With SPDIF, both Foobar and HQ Player worked fine (I had to increase HQ Player WASAPI buffer to 20 ms to avoid clicks). With MQn, music plays with regular background noise (clicks and pops).
What should I do to correct this behavior?
On the subject of Hugo's USB vs SPDIF, more listening is required. The Audiophilleo is brand new and needs break-in. The sound with the Audiophilleo is more relaxed, analog like, but the USB input has more details.
And I need to make MQn work with SPDIF in my system.
I have borrowed an Audiophilleo to compare my Hugo USB input vs SPDIF.
With the USB input, all the players available to me worked fine. MQn > HQ Player > Foobar.
With SPDIF, both Foobar and HQ Player worked fine (I had to increase HQ Player WASAPI buffer to 20 ms to avoid clicks). With MQn, music plays with regular background noise (clicks and pops).
What should I do to correct this behavior?
On the subject of Hugo's USB vs SPDIF, more listening is required. The Audiophilleo is brand new and needs break-in. The sound with the Audiophilleo is more relaxed, analog like, but the USB input has more details.
And I need to make MQn work with SPDIF in my system.
Last edited by adolfo.a.aguiar on Thu Aug 27, 2015 1:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
SDTrans384 with 1X5V and 3x3.3V supplied by A123 batteries, Soekris DAM1021 Rev2 with +-12V and 3.3V supplied by A123 batteries, Salas hotrodded DCB1, LM3875 Gainclone and IPL Acoustics S2TLM transmission line speakers
Re: MQN
play v85, just a few refinements to v75.
yes, am working on multi track, but was reading some agner fog assembly docs.
v86 a bit sweeter sounding, just swapped the position of some register moves, would probably settle for this one.
v88 seems very nice, has everything.
v89 even more in your face
something wrong with v89, tiring after a while, v88 best.
yes, am working on multi track, but was reading some agner fog assembly docs.
v86 a bit sweeter sounding, just swapped the position of some register moves, would probably settle for this one.
v88 seems very nice, has everything.
v89 even more in your face
something wrong with v89, tiring after a while, v88 best.