lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

v3.12 more viseral vibration over v3.11.2 - new favorite - thank you!
will listen to v3.12.1 tomorrow
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

goon-heaven wrote:v3.12 more viseral vibration over v3.11.2 - new favorite - thank you!
will listen to v3.12.1 tomorrow
3.12 is goooood. maybe the current best piano fast notes
3.12 weight(or decay?) don't feel enough. (piano fast notes which don't need decay, are best i ever heard)
3.12.1 weight maybe a little over

3.12 just feels like... need more bass quantity?!?!

prefer 3.12!
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

big sensitive, exchanged registers and sound has become better. there's loop of v3.11.2 is good already, only what regisgters take to use.
3.12.1 use Sleep function instead of WaitForSingleObject for holding child thread. think better but calculation instruction IDIV make sound distorted a bit. division very difficult for computer.
v3.12 is first now.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:big sensitive, exchanged registers and sound has become better. there's loop of v3.11.2 is good already, only what regisgters take to use.
3.12.1 use Sleep function instead of WaitForSingleObject for holding child thread. think better but calculation instruction IDIV make sound distorted a bit. division very difficult for computer.
v3.12 is first now.
3.12.1 is actually just as good as 3.12
3.12.1 the weight/note accuracy/rhythm is slower than norm.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt, i think @ > !

tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"

@.exe not work for some reason
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:lekt, i think @ > !

tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"

@.exe not work for some reason
maybe, will try.
only i think OS function have looking in name's list (or use hash method) so then !, #, $ have character code 33, 35, 36, and ! always first place in order. char code of @ is 64.

@.exe also don't work for me.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:lekt, i think @ > !

tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"

@.exe not work for some reason
maybe, will try.
only i think OS function have looking in name's list (or use hash method) so then !, #, $ have character code 33, 35, 36, and ! always first place in order. char code of @ is 64.

@.exe also don't work for me.
Try !.exe --file @.wav" better than
!.exe --file "!.wav"
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

/@.exe --file "@.wav" works nicely here.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

uploaded:
v3.12.2 256
v3.12.3 256
v3.13 256 opcode

opcode have very good focus, seems something makes sound not free. write machine code directly into executing RAM by instructions, there's small block of code can do by this method. try them.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

think 3.12.2 is better
need more weight. e.g. vocal weight lesser than 3.9 small
Post Reply