lekt player
- goon-heaven
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: lekt player
v3.12 more viseral vibration over v3.11.2 - new favorite - thank you!
will listen to v3.12.1 tomorrow
will listen to v3.12.1 tomorrow
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
3.12 is goooood. maybe the current best piano fast notesgoon-heaven wrote:v3.12 more viseral vibration over v3.11.2 - new favorite - thank you!
will listen to v3.12.1 tomorrow
3.12 weight(or decay?) don't feel enough. (piano fast notes which don't need decay, are best i ever heard)
3.12.1 weight maybe a little over
3.12 just feels like... need more bass quantity?!?!
prefer 3.12!
Re: lekt player
big sensitive, exchanged registers and sound has become better. there's loop of v3.11.2 is good already, only what regisgters take to use.
3.12.1 use Sleep function instead of WaitForSingleObject for holding child thread. think better but calculation instruction IDIV make sound distorted a bit. division very difficult for computer.
v3.12 is first now.
3.12.1 use Sleep function instead of WaitForSingleObject for holding child thread. think better but calculation instruction IDIV make sound distorted a bit. division very difficult for computer.
v3.12 is first now.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
3.12.1 is actually just as good as 3.12lekt wrote:big sensitive, exchanged registers and sound has become better. there's loop of v3.11.2 is good already, only what regisgters take to use.
3.12.1 use Sleep function instead of WaitForSingleObject for holding child thread. think better but calculation instruction IDIV make sound distorted a bit. division very difficult for computer.
v3.12 is first now.
3.12.1 the weight/note accuracy/rhythm is slower than norm.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
lekt, i think @ > !
tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"
@.exe not work for some reason
tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"
@.exe not work for some reason
Re: lekt player
maybe, will try.jesuscheung wrote:lekt, i think @ > !
tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"
@.exe not work for some reason
only i think OS function have looking in name's list (or use hash method) so then !, #, $ have character code 33, 35, 36, and ! always first place in order. char code of @ is 64.
@.exe also don't work for me.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
Try !.exe --file @.wav" better thanlekt wrote:maybe, will try.jesuscheung wrote:lekt, i think @ > !
tested with drive name = "@", "@.wav"
@.exe not work for some reason
only i think OS function have looking in name's list (or use hash method) so then !, #, $ have character code 33, 35, 36, and ! always first place in order. char code of @ is 64.
@.exe also don't work for me.
!.exe --file "!.wav"
- goon-heaven
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: lekt player
/@.exe --file "@.wav" works nicely here.
Re: lekt player
uploaded:
v3.12.2 256
v3.12.3 256
v3.13 256 opcode
opcode have very good focus, seems something makes sound not free. write machine code directly into executing RAM by instructions, there's small block of code can do by this method. try them.
v3.12.2 256
v3.12.3 256
v3.13 256 opcode
opcode have very good focus, seems something makes sound not free. write machine code directly into executing RAM by instructions, there's small block of code can do by this method. try them.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
think 3.12.2 is better
need more weight. e.g. vocal weight lesser than 3.9 small
need more weight. e.g. vocal weight lesser than 3.9 small