lekt player
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
i am used to listening to buffer=352. the sound is the richest
132 has highest stability in sound of all clockrates i tried.
(maybe it was false-rich)
i am greedy, i am stability + richest sound... haha maybe i need new soundcard that supports 160/320/640
132 is a terrible number.... not divisible by 32. nothing binary about this number.
132 has highest stability in sound of all clockrates i tried.
(maybe it was false-rich)
i am greedy, i am stability + richest sound... haha maybe i need new soundcard that supports 160/320/640
132 is a terrible number.... not divisible by 32. nothing binary about this number.
- goon-heaven
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: lekt player
I intend to, as I fail to understand the maths.
I cant play at 132, only play at 133 (unless Lekt is playing number tricks with us?).
What lekt version you using?
But on an initial test at 89796, I heard micro detail I've not heard before on tracks I've thousands of times.
I cant play at 132, only play at 133 (unless Lekt is playing number tricks with us?).
What lekt version you using?
But on an initial test at 89796, I heard micro detail I've not heard before on tracks I've thousands of times.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
try 2.90.9goon-heaven wrote:I intend to, as I fail to understand the maths.
I cant play at 132, only play at 133 (unless Lekt is playing number tricks with us?).
What lekt version you using?
But on an initial test at 89796, I heard micro detail I've not heard before on tracks I've thousands of times.
2.90.8
2.90.4
s4
2.4.3
after 2.90.7, all versions are good... pick one
after 2.90.7, bass reaches lower.
Re: lekt player
uploaded v2.95 256
more vibration, softer bass.
this algorithm only good for buffer size wich is binary number 2^n, not benefit for size 160, 132...
size 64 will be best. is your sound card plays with 64?
more vibration, softer bass.
this algorithm only good for buffer size wich is binary number 2^n, not benefit for size 160, 132...
size 64 will be best. is your sound card plays with 64?
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
yes my soundcard plays with asio4all + 64 bufferlekt wrote:uploaded v2.95 256
more vibration, softer bass.
this algorithm only good for buffer size wich is binary number 2^n, not benefit for size 160, 132...
size 64 will be best. is your sound card plays with 64?
this version is super high ultra crackling!!! distortion too
- goon-heaven
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: lekt player
Yep. Crackly distortion at all buffer size 32, 64, 128, 256 etc.
Re: lekt player
v2.95.256 excelent sounds for me, very good, best of all versions. try with onboard. tested pointer of wasapi data buffer, pData & 1023 = 0 in my case. so then write code by way as assemler (not assembler, but by its way, hehe...).jesuscheung wrote:yes my soundcard plays with asio4all + 64 buffer
this version is super high ultra crackling!!! distortion too
is your card plays v2.94 abs with size 64?
Re: lekt player
v2.95 256 is fixed buffer size 256. here's your card isn't as mine. OK, will review code. unfortunatelly, very good sound. maybe try test with laptop onboard sound card.goon-heaven wrote:Yep. Crackly distortion at all buffer size 32, 64, 128, 256 etc.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
no working with onboard!?! song is skippedlekt wrote:v2.95.256 excelent sounds for me, very good, best of all versions. try with onboard. tested pointer of wasapi data buffer, pData & 1023 = 0 in my case. so then write code by way as assemler (not assembler, but by its way, hehe...).jesuscheung wrote:yes my soundcard plays with asio4all + 64 buffer
this version is super high ultra crackling!!! distortion too
is your card plays v2.94 abs with size 64?
no, my card doesn't play 64 with v2.94 abs
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
i installed ms C++ 2013 12.0.21005 onto my laptop. enough?