Tried it last night compared to 2.40 and found it a bit too lively and edgy on my system....that was after a lot of swapping around of MQN's so not a good time to do a comparison, will give it another run tonight and see how it sounds.sbgk wrote:listened to 3.41 sse2, like it quite a lot, anyone else tried it ? Lively presentation without being harsh and amazing detail.
MQN
Re: MQN
___________________________________________
SD Card DAC, Gryphon Essence Mono's & Pre Amp, Wilson Alexia 2 Speakers,VPI Scout 2 & Supatrac arm, Studer A812 R2R.
SD Card DAC, Gryphon Essence Mono's & Pre Amp, Wilson Alexia 2 Speakers,VPI Scout 2 & Supatrac arm, Studer A812 R2R.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:07 am
Re: MQN
Good bass layer in treble..... ?! what do you mean?jesuscheung wrote:3.39's treble is shinier, mellower, hence, seems as though 3.41 has more details. i think they are the same in resolution.sbgk wrote:listened to 3.41 sse2, like it quite a lot, anyone else tried it ? Lively presentation without being harsh and amazing detail.
clarity between instruments seems better with 3.39.
3.41 seems better focus coz background music is quieter.
very difficult to choose between the two.
prefer 3.39 has a good bass layer in treble
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:07 am
Re: MQN
If you like a more analog sound, try MQN 2.59...... its a nice revision.Sligolad wrote:Tried it last night compared to 2.40 and found it a bit too lively and edgy on my system....that was after a lot of swapping around of MQN's so not a good time to do a comparison, will give it another run tonight and see how it sounds.sbgk wrote:listened to 3.41 sse2, like it quite a lot, anyone else tried it ? Lively presentation without being harsh and amazing detail.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: MQN
no. distorted. sounds like midinige2000 wrote:i kinda like the 3.41 sse2
jc is 3.39 avx v2 working with you
3.39 avx v2 > 3.39 avx
3.39 avx crackles.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: MQN
rich treble while transparent while texture is kept.2channelaudio wrote:
Good bass layer in treble..... ?! what do you mean?
(some treble fakes richness. bloated not transparent)
which 2.59 u like? thousands of 2.59...
Re: MQN
same herejesuscheung wrote:no. distorted. sounds like midinige2000 wrote:i kinda like the 3.41 sse2
jc is 3.39 avx v2 working with you
3.39 avx v2 > 3.39 avx
3.39 avx crackles.
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Re: MQN
I can only find the 3.39 avx 2!nige2000 wrote:same herejesuscheung wrote:no. distorted. sounds like midinige2000 wrote:i kinda like the 3.41 sse2
jc is 3.39 avx v2 working with you
3.39 avx v2 > 3.39 avx
3.39 avx crackles.
Is there a 3.39 avx V2?!
I5 4440+TXCOmobo+JCAT Femto-Intona-JKRegen+HynesPS+TeraDak ATX-820W=JCATusb=DiverterHR=Wadia 931/922(GNSC mod)=PassLabsXA100.5=2xValhalla=Stacked&moded ESL57+JAS SuperTweet+2MJ Acoustics Ref.I
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
Re: MQN
I listened to the latest versions up to sse2 3.41, sse2 and 1644 material only.
I changed back the control to 1.6, I prefer it over 512 that I used lately.
My last reference was sse2 3.26 sub + 512. sse2 3.41+1.6 is a real competitor, it's cleaner, better bass control, but a little bit shouting in the mid-highs, however it seems more correct globally, though I like sse2 3.26 sub + 1.6 a lot (voices particularly), it only had a better bass control.
Listened:
Pat Metheny - Secret story
Pat Metheny - One quiet night
Youn Sun Nah - Same girl
Has anyone tested HPET+useplatformclock versus SQ?
It's not really clear to me how this setting influence the SQ, my default was 2.08MHz (checked with WinTimerTester), I tested 3.58MHz and 14.32MHz as well. The latest introduces some harshness, the sound seems more detailed but drier too, the other two are quite similar. I'll go with 3.58MHz, the sound seems to me more convincing overall.
Another test I recently made is about mqnplay.exe priority. I wasn't able to change it through Tasker, it remained at normal. Now with the latest mqnload version that accepts .bat file I added
wmic process where name="mqnplay.exe" CALL setpriority 128
and it works, though realtime is not accepted.
Values are:
idle: 64
below normal: 16384
normal: 32
above normal: 32768
high priority: 128
real time: 256
In my opinion High priority is better than Normal, the sound seems less constrained (I kill mqncontrol.exe too). There's more air around instruments.
MQn is really an outstanding player, thank you sbgk.
I changed back the control to 1.6, I prefer it over 512 that I used lately.
My last reference was sse2 3.26 sub + 512. sse2 3.41+1.6 is a real competitor, it's cleaner, better bass control, but a little bit shouting in the mid-highs, however it seems more correct globally, though I like sse2 3.26 sub + 1.6 a lot (voices particularly), it only had a better bass control.
Listened:
Pat Metheny - Secret story
Pat Metheny - One quiet night
Youn Sun Nah - Same girl
Has anyone tested HPET+useplatformclock versus SQ?
It's not really clear to me how this setting influence the SQ, my default was 2.08MHz (checked with WinTimerTester), I tested 3.58MHz and 14.32MHz as well. The latest introduces some harshness, the sound seems more detailed but drier too, the other two are quite similar. I'll go with 3.58MHz, the sound seems to me more convincing overall.
Another test I recently made is about mqnplay.exe priority. I wasn't able to change it through Tasker, it remained at normal. Now with the latest mqnload version that accepts .bat file I added
wmic process where name="mqnplay.exe" CALL setpriority 128
and it works, though realtime is not accepted.
Values are:
idle: 64
below normal: 16384
normal: 32
above normal: 32768
high priority: 128
real time: 256
In my opinion High priority is better than Normal, the sound seems less constrained (I kill mqncontrol.exe too). There's more air around instruments.
MQn is really an outstanding player, thank you sbgk.