MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
Post Reply
3daudio
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:27 pm

Re: MQN

Post by 3daudio »

can I have a 2.98 too fast too furious?
MQn-Player/WinServer12/AudioOptimizer 1.26-> Audioquest Diamond USB -> AR-T Legato II -> AMR DP-777 -> MEG 901K
Top
tony
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: MQN

Post by tony »

3daudio wrote:can I have a 2.98 too fast too furious?
Steady on old boy! The sibliant Anna Netrebko track sounds wonderful on 2.98not fast. I do remember Gordon advising 2.31 was nearly a wrap so not tempted to suggest this could be a closer!
Last edited by tony on Mon Apr 28, 2014 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GroupBuySD DAC/First Watt AlephJ/NigeAmp/Audio PC's/Lampi L4.5 Dac/ Groupbuy AD1862 DHT Dac /Quad ESL63's.Tannoy Legacy Cheviots.
Top
John Dot
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:19 pm

Re: MQN

Post by John Dot »

sbgk wrote:uploaded 2.98 not fast for a more natural presentation
[2.98 not fast] Again even more details, sound is incredibly open and airy with deep bass. This one is my favorite.
PC: CPU Q8400, 8GB Ram, Windows 8.1 x64
DAC: HRT Music Streamer II+, Asus Xonar Essence ST (+ HiEnd DYI upgrades)
Top
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

uploaded 2.99, just discovered another setting, sounds seems to be lifted to another level, may need tweaking, but seems ok on initial listen
Top
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

3daudio wrote:can I have a 2.98 too fast too furious?
doesn't come in your tyre size yet, wouldn't want you spinning out
Top
3daudio
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:27 pm

Re: MQN

Post by 3daudio »

sbgk wrote:
3daudio wrote:can I have a 2.98 too fast too furious?
doesn't come in your tyre size yet, wouldn't want you spinning out
I know...need 24/44.1 rims....rare size, hard to get...
MQn-Player/WinServer12/AudioOptimizer 1.26-> Audioquest Diamond USB -> AR-T Legato II -> AMR DP-777 -> MEG 901K
Top
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

sbgk wrote:uploaded 2.99, just discovered another setting, sounds seems to be lifted to another level, may need tweaking, but seems ok on initial listen
not quite right, so introduced a setting I'd taken out when trying to get a brighter sound

uploaded 2.99 sse2 and avx tuned versions

think this is good enough, the end for now as far as SQ goes

listening to Carol King, good for judging the SQ by the the break in her voice plus lot's of bass, drums and incidental sounds.

This is the best version I've produced, a real foot tapper which is always a good sign.
Top
tony
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: MQN

Post by tony »

2.99 was a bit brittle for me harsh treble. the tuned version seems to have restored some balance for me anyhow. Going back to the 12gb 2.97 whatever mistake you made sounds ok to me. Maybe i have spent too much time tonight on this!
GroupBuySD DAC/First Watt AlephJ/NigeAmp/Audio PC's/Lampi L4.5 Dac/ Groupbuy AD1862 DHT Dac /Quad ESL63's.Tannoy Legacy Cheviots.
Top
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

uploaded 2.99 24/96 sse2 and avx

with these latest versions 24/96 is really shining through, 16/44 sounds a bit rough in comparison, first time I've really noticed a difference.

24/16 next
Last edited by sbgk on Mon Apr 28, 2014 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

tony wrote:2.99 was a bit brittle for me harsh treble. the tuned version seems to have restored some balance for me anyhow. Going back to the 12gb 2.97 whatever mistake you made sounds ok to me. Maybe i have spent too much time tonight on this!
I'm sort of confident 2.99 is the better technical solution and it sounds good to me, see if it lasts.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Computer Audio”