That could be an answer why I can't hear difference for some tweaks I make, or my ears just slowing down...lol. I think you are right on!Aleg wrote:I believe you would when listening straight from a computerjesuscheung wrote:...
let's face it, a fresh OS is a big piece of jitter. even in non-gui mode. you are only listening to jitters. treble and bass and mid are all unstable.
But certain DACs do reclocking and certain people use highly stable reclockers, so I believe the effects maybe less prominent when not listening straight from the PC.
Cheers
Aleg
MQN
Re: MQN
i3 Haswell, PPAStudio USB3 card and USB Micro cable/Chord Hugo/Nad-275BEE/Harbeth-30.1
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: MQN
don't understand.Aleg wrote:I believe you would when listening straight from a computerjesuscheung wrote:...
let's face it, a fresh OS is a big piece of jitter. even in non-gui mode. you are only listening to jitters. treble and bass and mid are all unstable.
But certain DACs do reclocking and certain people use highly stable reclockers, so I believe the effects maybe less prominent when not listening straight from the PC.
Cheers
Aleg
are you implying mqn is less prominent with better DAC do reclocking?
why don't you just use foobar haha
Re: MQN
Cvrle59cvrle59 wrote:Aleg - I know you appraised 100000 very highly, what really made me to put some effort to change driver and to make it work. Do you still find this version to be #1 choice for 16/44, or there is a new favorite in these R1.0's?
I am very satisfied with 32-bit R1.0 which is equivalent to 24-bit R1.1 I believe. When comparing it to 100000 I found it equivalent.
I have been doing so much comparing the last days that I was getting (literally) a bit tired of it and it becomes more difficult to obtain the required critical attention. More so because I have been focussing on the aspects I find most important, i.e. microdetails, airyness with realistic level of reverb and soundstage, and texture of the sound which should be realistic and supportive of the level of microdetails.
I have seen JC's critique on the quality of the bass but also a contrary opinion by ??? that quality of bass was just fine only the level of bass had increased a little. Personally I didn't notice anything off with bass.
Since discussion is continuing on the comparison of R1.1 vs 100000, I will listen again to both using non DRC-ed music.
As said I am very happy with the 32-bit R1.0 which allows me to listen to my DRC-ed music with a very good player.
Cheers
Aleg
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
Re: MQN
No, I say your listening setup might be more sensitive to jitter because you listen straight from PC and don't have any mittigating devices between your PC and your DDC/DAC.jesuscheung wrote:don't understand.Aleg wrote:I believe you would when listening straight from a computerjesuscheung wrote:...
let's face it, a fresh OS is a big piece of jitter. even in non-gui mode. you are only listening to jitters. treble and bass and mid are all unstable.
But certain DACs do reclocking and certain people use highly stable reclockers, so I believe the effects maybe less prominent when not listening straight from the PC.
Cheers
Aleg
are you implying mqn is less prominent with better DAC do reclocking?
why don't you just use foobar haha
It is mittigating, not removing.
Cheers
Aleg
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: MQN
aleg. please don't recommend random tweak to people like clockrate=23220 for everything.
since you said you "personally don't notice much difference".
i cannot be bothered to argue with you. you keep misspoken.
since you said you "personally don't notice much difference".
i cannot be bothered to argue with you. you keep misspoken.
Re: MQN
Aleg
can you try clockrate of 448 for 100000 and r1.0 512 for 16 bit
changes sq for me
lower values dont seem to help sq and i get difficult to find difference around 300-450
can you try clockrate of 448 for 100000 and r1.0 512 for 16 bit
changes sq for me
lower values dont seem to help sq and i get difficult to find difference around 300-450
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Re: MQN
Now I'm confused (again)!nige2000 wrote:Aleg
can you try clockrate of 448 for 100000 and r1.0 512 for 16 bit
changes sq for me
lower values dont seem to help sq and i get difficult to find difference around 300-450
Didn't we always used the clock rates 23220 or 46440?!
What's 448 now?!
I5 4440+TXCOmobo+JCAT Femto-Intona-JKRegen+HynesPS+TeraDak ATX-820W=JCATusb=DiverterHR=Wadia 931/922(GNSC mod)=PassLabsXA100.5=2xValhalla=Stacked&moded ESL57+JAS SuperTweet+2MJ Acoustics Ref.I
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
Re: MQN
yea its sort of pushing itsima66 wrote:Now I'm confused (again)!nige2000 wrote:Aleg
can you try clockrate of 448 for 100000 and r1.0 512 for 16 bit
changes sq for me
lower values dont seem to help sq and i get difficult to find difference around 300-450
Didn't we always used the clock rates 23220 or 46440?!
What's 448 now?!
try it and see
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Re: MQN
What value exactly do I have to put for the clock rate? Just 448?nige2000 wrote:yea its sort of pushing itsima66 wrote:Now I'm confused (again)!nige2000 wrote:Aleg
can you try clockrate of 448 for 100000 and r1.0 512 for 16 bit
changes sq for me
lower values dont seem to help sq and i get difficult to find difference around 300-450
Didn't we always used the clock rates 23220 or 46440?!
What's 448 now?!
try it and see
I5 4440+TXCOmobo+JCAT Femto-Intona-JKRegen+HynesPS+TeraDak ATX-820W=JCATusb=DiverterHR=Wadia 931/922(GNSC mod)=PassLabsXA100.5=2xValhalla=Stacked&moded ESL57+JAS SuperTweet+2MJ Acoustics Ref.I
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS