lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

Stutter after track end is still an issue for me in 2.70.s1 - but sounds very nice before the end
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

ignore my comments on 2.70

sorry i forgot to download lekt.exe
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

goon-heaven wrote:Stutter after track end is still an issue for me in 2.70.s1 - but sounds very nice before the end
yes yes. very nice indeed. nicest vocal!
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

don't think i heard better vocal than 2.70 s1 on win2012
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

there is some kind of very sweet natural stability in sound of 2.70 s1. i only heard this sound on xa+win7.

it is coming alive in win2012!
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

few days my win8 has become bad, not stable. very difficult listen normal sound of bass, sometime give weird bass. need review and compare soundstage of v2.69 s5 and v2.70's. seem s5 have better and correct stage, 2.70 vibration better. some bugs of begin and end audio stream still not fixed. i will try more.
internethandle
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:57 am

Re: lekt player

Post by internethandle »

JC, stop hiding in this thread and give me more tweaks! lol

I think I have a few to contribute, but I get the feeling that you're getting weary of tweaks and favor a minimal tweak approach now, given how many tweaks you've recently decided were bad for SQ.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

internethandle wrote:JC, stop hiding in this thread and give me more tweaks! lol

I think I have a few to contribute, but I get the feeling that you're getting weary of tweaks and favor a minimal tweak approach now, given how many tweaks you've recently decided were bad for SQ.
got busy recently.

i will be stripping the non-gui mode of 2012. need to compare the exact differences between core and non-gui.

shall be making an iso.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:don't think i heard better vocal than 2.70 s1 on win2012
i have retested by speakers, vocal very good. although s1 bass vibration not much, but vocal have nice vibration, focus very correct, vocal voice rises up and longer ended, clarity. excellent vocal.
iori
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 2:43 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by iori »

Preferred 2.70 s2 for pin point focus and subtle harmonics. Exact location of the vocalist is almost visible. The voice comes from his mouth / body resonance, and not from a wall of sound. Position of each individual vocalist can be clearly reproduced. We are all familiar with human voices :)
Post Reply