lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:seriously, 2.31 256 fibonacci is very very natural. just need fix earaches and make it better...
uploaded v2.32.1 256 Fibonacci , optimized from 2.31 256 Fibonacci and use method of 2.32. its sound is same as 3.31, no erache, bass vibration better.

JC, 2.31 have musical notes very correct, so pretty sound and emotion. now notes are important, otherwise not musical emotion. notice musical scale, tonality. 2.32 is not correct.
2.31 256 is 99.99% natural. totally transparent. no digital layer. no control. just musical + earaches.
after i listened to 2.31, other versions don't sound analog!!!

2.32.1. enjoy it ok. not quite the same. better vibration. richer. a very thin layer of control (which can only be detected after listening to 2.31 lol)
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:2.32.1. enjoy it ok. not quite the same. better vibration. richer. a very thin layer of control (which can only be detected after listening to 2.31 lol)
2.32.1 bass richer but volume lesser, a bit compressed. bad.
need improve bass.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

back to 2.31.x , code executing slower than 2.32.x but sound is good, maybe data transfer is more regularly (slowly but regularly), does'nt raised electrical "shock" on RAM. hehe... my english + google translate english

uploaded v2.31.3 256 , i feel all things in normal level. try it.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:back to 2.31.x , code executing slower than 2.32.x but sound is good, maybe data transfer is more regularly (slowly but regularly), does'nt raised electrical "shock" on RAM. hehe... my english + google translate english

uploaded v2.31.3 256 , i feel all things in normal level. try it.
regular is good! irregular activities cause voltage spikes!

piano
-2.31 has perfect weight+flow for listening. not crispy enough.
-2.31.3 may have maximum possible texture+details in notes!! it is more crispy, but flow not enjoyable coz heavy notes too loud.

vocal
-2.31 has better balance of high sound density and vibration. so more airy+transparent.
-2.31.3 focus in vibration, better vibration.
-prefer 2.31 more heartfelt.

rock
-2.31.3 better

overall
-2.31.3 more correct
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:...overall
-2.31.3 more correct
2.31.3 compiled some day ago, i take it for lekt standard version (soundstage, volume, brightness,...) so other versions can compare with it. its musical notes a bit lower than norm (2.31 is more correct, good!), that musical emotion lesser, intense not enough. wait for next...
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

more i listen to 2.31, more i think it is special.

have you been to a cave? it can be quiet and cold. you can hear echo. you feel cold. 2.31 gives me this feeling! amazing. i can feel the air is cold as though i am there in the studio. i don't think another software player has this effect.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:more i listen to 2.31, more i think it is special.

have you been to a cave? it can be quiet and cold. you can hear echo. you feel cold. 2.31 gives me this feeling! amazing. i can feel the air is cold as though i am there in the studio. i don't think another software player has this effect.
uploaded v2.33 256 Fibonacci
no earche, better vibration ( 2.33 = (2.31 + 2.32) / 2 ). try it and enjoy.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

very good! better
possibly, 2.33 = 2.31*0.6 + 2.32*0.4 ??
weight of piano heavy notes is 0.5-1% more than norm.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:...weight of piano heavy notes is 0.5-1% more than norm.
i don't understand, heavy notes are high notes or low (bass) notes?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

sorry, i mean loud treble notes are slightly bright or little too loud.
Post Reply