lekt player
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
2.7.1 v3
stuck. no sound.
2.7.1. v2
-higher sound density. still mellow and airy.
-very easy on headphones. think needs a bit more power.
-vocal vibration is good needs stronger vibration more power.
-flow better
-clearer, cleaner
-stage seems excellent. simple and focus. best so far? need more listening
-overall need very slightly more weight/power/emotion! but don't add not too much. after you do this, i think it will be a reference version.
stuck. no sound.
2.7.1. v2
-higher sound density. still mellow and airy.
-very easy on headphones. think needs a bit more power.
-vocal vibration is good needs stronger vibration more power.
-flow better
-clearer, cleaner
-stage seems excellent. simple and focus. best so far? need more listening
-overall need very slightly more weight/power/emotion! but don't add not too much. after you do this, i think it will be a reference version.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
2.7.1. v2
piano much better. more and more correct. need stronger/longer impact but keep the weight. not sure i am making any sense.
piano much better. more and more correct. need stronger/longer impact but keep the weight. not sure i am making any sense.
- goon-heaven
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: lekt player
+1. Clean. Good vibration. Best yet.jesuscheung wrote:2.7.1 v3
stuck. no sound.
2.7.1. v2
-higher sound density. still mellow and airy.
-very easy on headphones.
-vocal vibration is good
-flow better
-clearer, cleaner
-stage seems excellent. simple and focus. best so far
Re: lekt player
vibration, JC. have some methods impvove vibration (including use hardware technologue, compiler setting), but they always affect to soundstage, change sound texture. it mean they are not good, not correct, or wrong way i used. optimization code is best way. im trying do this.jesuscheung wrote:2.7.1. v2
piano much better. more and more correct. need stronger/longer impact but keep the weight. not sure i am making any sense.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
when i have time, going to experiment turning off "Hardware Prefetcher" and "Adjacent Cache Line Prefetch" in bios, see if SQ will be better.lekt wrote:vibration, JC. have some methods impvove vibration (including use hardware technologue, compiler setting), but they always affect to soundstage, change sound texture. it mean they are not good, not correct, or wrong way i used. optimization code is best way. im trying do this.jesuscheung wrote:2.7.1. v2
piano much better. more and more correct. need stronger/longer impact but keep the weight. not sure i am making any sense.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
disabled both "Hardware Prefetcher" and "Adjacent Cache Line Prefetch".
definitely have some positive effects on stage. much better control on brightness. seems better clarity.
also some negative effects. less refined on small things. some added earaches.
tested with MQn, and lekt player.
very interesting. not all bad. not all good.
you are right. hardware techs have quite an effect on stage.
definitely have some positive effects on stage. much better control on brightness. seems better clarity.
also some negative effects. less refined on small things. some added earaches.
tested with MQn, and lekt player.
very interesting. not all bad. not all good.
you are right. hardware techs have quite an effect on stage.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
sorry. misjudged the weight. had a bad tweak.jesuscheung wrote: 2.1.7.2
....
-overall need very slightly more weight/power/emotion! but don't add not too much. after you do this, i think it will be a reference version.
relisten to 2.1.7.2
treble a bit bright. the tune needs fix.
bass ok as always.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
hey goon-heaven, we are confused with the version number. 2.71 v2 is MQn. lekt's is 2.1.7.2... haha
- goon-heaven
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: lekt player
Yup Brian. I am easily confused. Haha
I meant lekt.exe1644 v2.17.2 1024.*
I meant lekt.exe1644 v2.17.2 1024.*
Re: lekt player
Lekt, I startred a thread on an I2S error which afflicts all DACs & which is solvable in software viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2485
I thought you might be interested in trying an implementation of it in your player to check what it sounds like?
PM or post if you want to follow it up
I thought you might be interested in trying an implementation of it in your player to check what it sounds like?
PM or post if you want to follow it up
www.Ciunas.biz
For Digital Audio playback that delivers WHERE the performers are on stage but more importantly WHY they are there.
For Digital Audio playback that delivers WHERE the performers are on stage but more importantly WHY they are there.