There is only so much cake in the world!
When the greedy people want to have more than their fair share, then there is less cake for everyone else.
Buy locally.
Build locally.
Grow locally.
Share locally.
Results in a fair slice of the cake for everyone.
back to R1. i find it difficult to enjoy MQn on R2. coz it has too many inmature drivers (took me a year to collect perfect driver combination for R1)
anyway. 2.71s are excellent!
may prefer 2.71 over 2.71 v2
2.71>2.7s
2.71>2.69s
2.71>2.68s
....
2.71 needs more musicality. needs a strong bass layer for vocal emotion to kick in.
i find 2.66 v2, mfence and xmm more musical than 2.71. not saying 2.71 doesn't have excellent emotion, it has!
nige2000 wrote:nearly thought you were having a laugh with 2.71 v2 and uploaded a placebo
but after awhile i think v2 is cleaner and more immersive than v1
but damn theres not much between them
some differences. v1 is more flat. v1 has a little more micro-details.
2.71s sounds like the old versions using intel C++? i remember the old ones lack vibration and micro-details. this two 2.71 are much better than the old ones.
nige2000 maybe coz you using 800MHz 5-5-5 on a 1600MHz 9-9-9 RAM? 5-5-5-9 compresses details in my system. i had used 5-5-5-9 for a long time and given up on it.
nige2000 saw you using 800 for both CPU and RAM. why don't you try 1600 for both CPU and RAM? interested to know the result. am testing best CPU and RAM ratio for SQ. think 2 to 1 is best. not sure. never tried 1 to 1 like you.
nige2000 wrote:nearly thought you were having a laugh with 2.71 v2 and uploaded a placebo
but after awhile i think v2 is cleaner and more immersive than v1
but damn theres not much between them
some differences. v1 is more flat. v1 has a little more micro-details.
2.71s sounds like the old versions using intel C++? i remember the old ones lack vibration and micro-details. this two 2.71 are much better than the old ones.
nige2000 maybe coz you using 800MHz 5-5-5 on a 1600MHz 9-9-9 RAM? 5-5-5-9 compresses details in my system. i had used 5-5-5-9 for a long time and given up on it.
nige2000 saw you using 800 for both CPU and RAM. why don't you try 1600 for both CPU and RAM? interested to know the result. am testing best CPU and RAM ratio for SQ. think 2 to 1 is best. not sure. never tried 1 to 1 like you.
Not sure if I prefer 5 5 5 9 or 6 6 6 11 at 800mhz
in certain I prefer cpu at 800 rather than any other frequency
have not tried 1600:1600 cpu:ram frequency
might be worth a try
Lower frequency less power seemed to be productive for me
but im only stumbling in the dark
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
