Search found 85 matches
- Fri May 09, 2014 10:44 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
Your're a beast Gordon. Excellent work! Will donate!
- Fri May 09, 2014 1:43 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
Yes 3.35 sse is very good happy with that one too. Sound to me that it has a tad mor res than the latest avx, but I miss the leading edge of notes that avx gives us the initial pluck of a string or the impact on the skin of a drum, more speed. Hope 3.35 avx fixes that :) Do you see the light Gordon?
- Fri May 09, 2014 4:37 am
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
Hi Aleg, I set to run as administrator on both, mqncontrol and mqnplay1644, but still I can't run my MQn folder with any of the new versions! I'm still stuck at "your" 3.14avx. I just get a blink of the black box and nothing else! Everything stays the same except the "old" mqnpl...
- Thu May 08, 2014 4:13 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
Cheers mate!madman6000 wrote:Fuck me that worked wtf. Thanks for all of your help everyone!darkpink wrote:Haven't you red about the avx ritual? :)
Try avx in a new folder and delete the old one, works most of the time.
- Thu May 08, 2014 4:04 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
Haven't you red about the avx ritual? :)
Try avx in a new folder and delete the old one, works most of the time.
Try avx in a new folder and delete the old one, works most of the time.
- Wed May 07, 2014 9:45 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
Could be true, haven't listened to it on my main rig yet. The only difference I noticed when testing was just the balance of the presentation.John Dot wrote:3.31 I think this is the best and final version. Period.
I can't imagine how SQ could be better.
- Wed May 07, 2014 8:08 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
Still think mqnplay1644.exe lmn x 2 is better than 3.31 vocals sounds a little supressed in the new one, bass is very strong.
- Wed May 07, 2014 2:48 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
*From the Naim Forum* " I once worked for a company who engaged with 3i. If Naim/Focal had "teamed up" with 3i, all our worst nighmares would come true. They would be sold within 3 years to a (say) Chinese conglomerate who would turn out sub-£1k mass-market products through highstree...
- Wed May 07, 2014 2:18 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
*From the Naim Forum* " I once worked for a company who engaged with 3i. If Naim/Focal had "teamed up" with 3i, all our worst nighmares would come true. They would be sold within 3 years to a (say) Chinese conglomerate who would turn out sub-£1k mass-market products through highstreet...
- Wed May 07, 2014 2:02 pm
- Forum: Computer Audio
- Topic: MQN
- Replies: 8039
- Views: 645735
Re: MQN
I think that mqnplay1644.exe lmn x 2 sounds the best of the three.