Search found 205 matches

by Clive
Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:22 am
Forum: Computer Audio
Topic: MQN
Replies: 8039
Views: 521349

Re: MQN

I can't explain why but I felt compelled to run a blind test for the PFM cynics, the reactions are as expected but at least I feel I've done my bit. I will try my level best to leave them to it now. Very poor performance there Clive! You should have got a solicitor to word your testing procedure. V...
by Clive
Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:30 am
Forum: Computer Audio
Topic: MQN
Replies: 8039
Views: 521349

Re: MQN

I can't explain why but I felt compelled to run a blind test for the PFM cynics, the reactions are as expected but at least I feel I've done my bit. I will try my level best to leave them to it now.
by Clive
Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:08 am
Forum: Computer Audio
Topic: MQN
Replies: 8039
Views: 521349

Re: MQN

I need to ask how some are playing 24/192 files with 2.60. I've read that MQn places all files in a 24 bit container but I can't play hi res even it's slugged down to 44.1 by MQn - what am I missing here? The elderly 24/96 version works.
by Clive
Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:56 am
Forum: Computer Audio
Topic: MQN
Replies: 8039
Views: 521349

Re: MQN

Last night, amongst all the fora activity I actually listened to MQn :-) 2.60 8 4 - I still have to try the other 2.60 versions. What I want to say though is that whilst the earlier versions have been excellent, 2.60, as you'd hope is very very good indeed. I was playing Bonnie Raitt / The Lost Broa...
by Clive
Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:16 pm
Forum: Computer Audio
Topic: MQN
Replies: 8039
Views: 521349

Re: MQN

I had a feeling this would be a good home. I look forward to tying the latest add version tomorrow morning, sounds promising!

Glad you're back sgbk!