MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
3daudio
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:27 pm

Re: MQN

Post by 3daudio »

jrling wrote:
sbgk wrote:uploaded 7.63 24/96 ax2, it's got the recommended loop, does it solve any issues ?

7.64 maybe sounds better
Don't know as there are no Normal or 1644 updated versions?
Only Go(r)d(on) knows why MQn has turned into a high res player for avx lately.. sigh....
MQn-Player/WinServer12/AudioOptimizer 1.26-> Audioquest Diamond USB -> AR-T Legato II -> AMR DP-777 -> MEG 901K
jrling
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:54 pm
Location: London

Re: MQN

Post by jrling »

3daudio wrote:
jrling wrote:
sbgk wrote:uploaded 7.63 24/96 ax2, it's got the recommended loop, does it solve any issues ?

7.64 maybe sounds better
Don't know as there are no Normal or 1644 updated versions?
Only Go(r)d(on) knows why MQn has turned into a high res player for avx lately.. sigh....
It is because he has been listening to The Beach Boys ["God Only Knows"]?
Maplin XM21X 12V float charging A123 26650 LiFePO4 battery/Maxwell Supercap PSU for Mitac PD10-BI J1900 Bay Trail, WTFPlay, Hiface Evo, Bow Technologies 1704 NOS DAC, StereoKnight TVC, Quad II monoblocks, ZU Audio Druid Mk4/Method Sub
rickmcinnis
Posts: 588
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: MQN

Post by rickmcinnis »

Well, this cat is overwhelmed. Not yet dead, though.

I would not begin to understand how to use that.

That really can be made to do stuff one can do in PE Explorer? Looks more like the building blocks of your .exe.
phonograph, amplifiers & speakers
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

rickmcinnis wrote:Well, this cat is overwhelmed. Not yet dead, though.

I would not begin to understand how to use that.

That really can be made to do stuff one can do in PE Explorer? Looks more like the building blocks of your .exe.
thought you were trying to understand the code

what are you using to see that things have changed ?
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

uploaded 7.67

set to unicode, though don't know if it will help.

24/96 because it gives the best indication of sq, avx2 because that's what I'm using and sounds best.

lot's going on with this one, takes on a life of it's own.

am using Amandine Beyer & Gli Incogniti The Four Seasons to test for echo

shall make a 16/44 version

1 setting was making it sound soft, 7.68 has more punch

uploaded 3 versions all real time priority, but with different thread priorities critical (slight loss of top end), highest and normal. Think normal sounds best so far. think critical is competing with system processes. highest a little bit as well.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

7.67 no sound
7.68 has sound
sima66
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:35 pm
Location: Canada

Re: MQN

Post by sima66 »

So far 7.68 is, again, the best from the latest (didn't try only the 7.65) and obviously we are heading into the right direction.
7.68 avx2 rt norm has a bit better detail and the 7.68 avx2 has more body and deeper/stronger bass. Those two are my favourite ones and I can go with either of them.
Slightly I prefer the 7.68 avx2 rt norm.

On the other hand, comparing to the 5.14/2.97 we are still not there!
5.14(24/96) has still better details and clarity.
I5 4440+TXCOmobo+JCAT Femto-Intona-JKRegen+HynesPS+TeraDak ATX-820W=JCATusb=DiverterHR=Wadia 931/922(GNSC mod)=PassLabsXA100.5=2xValhalla=Stacked&moded ESL57+JAS SuperTweet+2MJ Acoustics Ref.I
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

7.68 no sound now... what went wrong

back to 7.46
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

nige2000 wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:why 5ms... make it to 1 to 2ms or 32/64/96/128
Some dacs can't cope with 1ms
So this is a parameter that should be configurable, so each can choose a suitable value for his setup.
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

Aleg wrote:
nige2000 wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:why 5ms... make it to 1 to 2ms or 32/64/96/128
Some dacs can't cope with 1ms
So this is a parameter that should be configurable, so each can choose a suitable value for his setup.
rt high >rt norm
rt critical was a non runner pretty poor

definitely timing is better which helps resolution a little, reducing buffer size would help more but i think there must be something else not right

rt high 5ms would be nice?
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Post Reply